首页> 外文OA文献 >Righteous realism versus postmodern play : the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in female-authored French fiction.
【2h】

Righteous realism versus postmodern play : the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in female-authored French fiction.

机译:正义的现实主义与后现代的戏剧:女性创作的法国小说中的以巴冲突。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article analyses literary mediations of francophone Jewish attitudes towards Israel, and particularly towards the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Its primary corpus comprises two female-authored novels published during the Second Intifada: Olivia Rosenthal's Les Fantaisies spéculatives de J.H. le sémite (2005) and Chantal Osterreicher's L'Insouciance d'Adèle (2006). It demonstrates how these two texts represent antithetical stances towards Israel, the former intermittently critical and even censorious, the latter defensive and at least partly valorising. Given the status of both authors as French-born Jews (although Osterreicher now lives in Israel), both of these texts can be seen to mediate heterodox attitudes to the conflict. But the heterodoxy depends upon the context in which the reader places the two authors. In the context of the twenty-first-century France in which it was published, which, like most other countries in the global mediasphere, is heavily critical of Israel, Osterreicher's text is acidly contestatory of default-position anti-Zionism. On the other hand, in the context of the French Jewry to which Rosenthal belongs, which has traditionally evinced unflinching solidarity with Israel, her own critique of that country's dealings with Palestinians is equally contestatory, and, despite its ludicity, is no less impactful than Osterreicher's reverse discourse. A final axis of enquiry is the extent to which there may be some consensus as well as obvious dissensus between these two ostensibly antinomous texts.
机译:本文分析了法语国家对以色列,特别是对以巴冲突的犹太人的文学调解。它的主要主体包括第二次起义期间出版的两本女性创作的小说:奥利维亚·罗森塔尔(Olivia Rosenthal)的《 Le Fantaisiesspéculativesde J.H.》。 lesémite(2005)和Chantal Osterreicher的L'Insouciance d'Adèle(2006)。它展示了这两个文本如何代表对以色列的对立立场,前者是断断续续的批评甚至是审查制度,后者是防御性的,至少是部分增值。考虑到两位作者都是法国出生的犹太人的身份(尽管Osterreicher现在居住在以色列),可以看到这两个文本都调解了对冲突的异质态度。但是,异端取决于读者放置两位作者的环境。与全球媒体领域中的大多数其他国家一样,在二十一世纪出版的法国的背景下,法国对以色列提出了严厉的批评,奥斯特赖克(Osterreicher)的案文极力反对默认立场的反犹太复国主义。另一方面,在卢森塔尔(Rosenthal)所属的法国犹太人的背景下,历来表现出对以色列的坚定不移的团结,她对那个国家与巴勒斯坦人打交道的批评同样是竞争性的,尽管它带有讽刺意味,但其影响力不亚于Osterreicher的反向话语。询问的最后一个轴是,这两个表面上反义的文本之间可能达成某种共识以及明显的分歧。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cairns Lucille;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号