首页> 外文OA文献 >Területfejlesztési vagy iparpolitika? A francia versenyképességi pólus program tapasztalatai = Spatial development or industrial policy? The experiences of competitiveness poles in France
【2h】

Területfejlesztési vagy iparpolitika? A francia versenyképességi pólus program tapasztalatai = Spatial development or industrial policy? The experiences of competitiveness poles in France

机译:区域发展还是产业政策?法国竞争性极点计划的经验=空间发展还是产业政策?法国竞争优势的经验

摘要

The study seeks to present a multigenerational construction, the French competitiveness poles, the theoretical background of their creation and some practical experiences gained through two cycles of their operation. We will keep an eye on the specific cultural-national context which leaves its mark on the effective realisation of the programme, being a source of disadvantages and also shaping innovation propensity. The French poles are relatively young constructions which are situated at the intersection of spatial development, competitiveness and industrial policies. While the primary characteristic of spatial development policy is that it is adapted to the national space, the French programme of competitiveness poles transcends the national borders and focuses on spatial competitiveness in the spirit of the European discourse. While we do not reject the theory according to which strategies of large multinational firms shape and determine the destiny of individual regions, influence their rise or demise, it is necessary that we do not regard a given region a passive receptor of global processes, but a dynamically changing construction as a result of the collective action of heterogeneous stakeholders. The programme of competitiveness poles seeks to symbolize this collective effort directed towards the amelioration of the state of an entire region. The programme can be interpreted as a revised and updated version of the traditional model of central policy measures directed at stimulating innovation. The core elements of the current programme are spatial systems of innovation, and its major objective is to achieve the critical mass of industrial capacities and scientific institutions. The functioning of the poles is based on open innovation, the core of which is that firms perform innovative activity in collaboration with their partners in order to avoid being isolated within their institutional frameworks. The major stakeholders of the poles are small and medium-sized companies in harmony with the European employment objectives, since they are the major source of job creation in France as well. They encounter the largest obstacles to creating the sufficient conditions of innovation and experience severe difficulties in forming efficient partnerships with multinational firms. Even though it is too premature to evaluate the programme’s success or failure, various problems are already visible. For instance, the too large number of poles to be reduced from the current cycle starting from 2014; a sometimes symbolic relationship between higher educational institutions and the research sector; the sometimes quite erroneous choice of sectors to be developed; the lack of specialization within the various poles; a non-reasonable geographical delimitation of poles (encompassing one or multiple regions); failure to achieve international visibility, and a danger of an excessive fragmentation of funding resources. Whether the state is more inclined to apply the programme as a national industrial policy instrument (while neglecting the aspects of territorial embeddedness), or use them to serve the traditional harmonisation goals of spatial development policy (to their large number and relatively even distribution in the national space), the success of the programme will only be manifested if the poles resist the test of time and become solid foundations of the national competitiveness-based economic policy.
机译:该研究旨在介绍多代人的建设,法国竞争力的极点,其创造的理论背景以及通过两个运作周期获得的一些实践经验。我们将密切关注特定的文化国家背景,这在有效实施该计划的过程中留下了印记,既成为劣势的根源,也塑造了创新的倾向。法国两极是相对年轻的建筑,位于空间发展,竞争力和产业政策的交汇处。尽管空间发展政策的主要特征是适应国家空间,但法国的竞争力纲领超越了国界,本着欧洲话语的精神侧重于空间竞争力。尽管我们不反对大型跨国公司的战略决定和决定单个地区的命运,影响其崛起或消亡的理论,但有必要使我们不要将给定的地区视为全球进程的被动接受者,而是由于不同利益相关者的集体行动而动态地改变了建筑。竞争极点计划旨在象征着旨在改善整个地区状况的集体努力。该计划可以解释为旨在刺激创新的中央政策措施传统模型的修订和更新版本。当前计划的核心要素是创新的空间系统,其主要目标是实现工业能力和科学机构的临界数量。两极的功能基于开放式创新,其核心是公司与合作伙伴合作进行创新活动,以避免被孤立在其机构框架之内。两极的主要利益相关者是符合欧洲就业目标的中小型公司,因为它们也是法国创造就业机会的主要来源。他们在创造足够的创新条件方面遇到最大的障碍,并且在与跨国公司建立有效的合作伙伴关系方面遇到严重困难。尽管现在评估该计划的成败还为时过早,但各种问题已经显而易见。例如,从2014年开始的当前周期中减少的极数过多;高等教育机构与研究部门之间有时是象征性的关系;有时会错误选择要开发的部门;各方面缺乏专业化;极点的不合理地理界限(包含一个或多个区域);未能获得国际知名度,以及资金资源过度分散的危险。国家是否更倾向于将该计划作为国家产业政策工具来应用(而忽略了领土嵌入的方面),还是将其用于服务于空间发展政策的传统协调目标(在其数量众多且相对均匀的情况下在区域内发展)国家空间),该计划的成功只有在两极抵制时间考验并成为基于国家竞争力的经济政策的坚实基础时才能体现出来。

著录项

  • 作者

    Egyed Ildikó;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 hu
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:42:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号