首页> 外文OA文献 >'A sure defence against the foe '? : maritime predation British commercial policy during the Spanish American Wars of Independence, 1810-1830
【2h】

'A sure defence against the foe '? : maritime predation British commercial policy during the Spanish American Wars of Independence, 1810-1830

机译:'确定对抗敌人'? :1810年至1830年西班牙美国独立战争期间的海上掠夺和英国商业政策

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The following study investigates the British government’s response to maritime predation in the period 1810-1830 and evaluates the effectiveness of the measures implemented to protect British trade and shipping. A necessary prerequisite for this task is to establish the impact of commerce raiding activity on the British mercantile marine, which has thus far eluded historians. Chapters one and two of the following study are dedicated to this purpose. In chapter one, the key findings of previous works with regard to the organizational and operational features of commerce-raiding activity are synthesised and the extent and nature of the threat posed to British trade and shipping is established. The ways in which this threat became a reality for British merchants is the subject of chapter two. The impact of predation on the British mercantile marine is identified through the use of quantitative and qualitative data. A database of prize actions, which can be defined as encounters between British merchant vessels and maritime predators, has been constructed for this study from the intelligence contained in contemporary newspapers and government correspondence. The database provides statistics on the number of British vessels affected by maritime predators, the annual frequency of prize actions, and the perpetrators responsible for their initiation. Adding depth to these statistics are the letters, petitions, memorials and claims certificates received by the British government, which give detailed breakdowns of the losses incurred by merchants in individual prize cases. In chapter three the wider political context within which the British government received merchant appeals for assistance is established, providing a framework with which to identify and explain the measures implemented to tackle the problems being experienced at sea and to evaluate their effectiveness. Chapters four through to seven thematically analyse the British government’s response to maritime predation. British countermeasures against the depredations of independent Spanish American commerce-raiders are addressed in chapter four. The British government’s response to Spanish predation is the subject of chapters five and six, while chapter seven provides an analysis of British policy towards Cuban-based piracy. These four chapters draw heavily upon government correspondence when identifying the measures implemented by British statesmen to counter the threat of maritime predation, while the public debates and the proceedings of the Anglo-Spanish claims commission underpin appraisals of the effectiveness of these measures. Given that commerce-raiding activity during the Spanish American Wars of Independence has never been examined from a British perspective, this study will add a new dimension to the existing literature. In doing so, this study will provide a platform from which to reassess the arguments of previous works with regard to the character of predation in the early nineteenth century, the motivation of those individuals who participated in the activity, and the contribution of commerce-raiding to the outcome of the independence conflict. However, the following study also has the potential to raise points of wider significance and make contributions to knowledge and understanding of other aspects of history. The focus of the current study on the effectiveness of British policy in protecting the interests of British merchants from the threat of predation therefore to shed light on wider social, political and economic changes occurring within Britain during the early nineteenth centuryThe upsurge in commerce-raiding activity during the Spanish American Wars of Independence occurred at a time of profound change in the direction of British economic policy. Cain and Hopkins have outlined the nature of this change and explained the rationale with which it was underpinned. They argue that between 1688 and 1850 Britain was ruled by a gentlemanly elite made up of an alliance between the landed aristocracy and financiers in the City of London. This alliance sought to service the national debt, fund patronage and manage the political system in ways that preserved privilege, civil peace and the constitution. In the period prior to 1815 the pursuit of these objectives saw the British government play a protectionist role in the economy. However, following the Napoleonic Wars it became clear that fundamental changes were needed to restore the health of the economy, maintain civil order and deflect growing criticism of the patronage system that had begun to circulate in the late eighteenth century. Consequently, the ruling class embarked on a process of redefining its role and purpose and gradually began to introduce reforms of the constitution, of the patronage system, of social legislation, and of economic policy. In the economic realm following the Napoleonic Wars, forward-looking members of the Tory government, who were inspired by Adam Smith’s attack on mercantilism in the Wealth of Nations, adopted a laissez-faire outlook and began to progressively withdraw the government from direct participation in the economic process.57 By 1850 the transition was effectively complete and mercantilism had given way to an era of free trade. As D.C.M. Platt has demonstrated, for the remainder of the nineteenth century the British government maintained an urgent official interest in the general welfare of British commerce overseas but exhibited a distinct prejudice against promoting individual financial and trading interests. This study promises to shed further light on early nineteenth-century British economic policy by providing a case-study with which to view this transition in action and with which to assess its significance to the lives of British subjects.
机译:以下研究调查了1810-1830年英国政府对海上掠夺活动的反应,并评估了为保护英国贸易和运输而采取的措施的有效性。这项任务的必要先决条件是,要建立商业袭击活动对英国商业海军的影响,而迄今为止,历史学家一直对此不以为然。以下研究的第一章和第二章专门针对此目的。在第一章中,总结了先前工作中有关商业袭击活动的组织和运作特征的主要发现,并确定了对英国贸易和航运构成威胁的程度和性质。第二章讨论了如何使这种威胁成为英国商人的现实。通过使用定量和定性数据,可以确定捕食对英国商船的影响。这项研究的数据库是根据当代报纸和政府通讯的情报,建立了一个奖励行动数据库,该数据库可被定义为英国商船与海上掠夺者之间的相遇。该数据库提供有关受海掠食者影响的英国船只的数量,年度奖励行动的频率以及肇事者的统计。英国政府收到的信件,请愿书,纪念物和索赔证明书进一步丰富了这些统计数据,其中详细列出了商人在个别奖金案中蒙受的损失。在第三章中,确立了英国政府接受商人寻求援助的更广泛的政治环境,提供了一个框架,用以识别和解释为解决海上遇到的问题而采取的措施并评估其有效性。第四章到第七章从主题上分析了英国政府对海上掠夺的反应。第四章讨论了英国对取缔独立的西班牙裔美国人进行商业袭击的对策。英国政府对西班牙掠夺的回应是第五章和第六章的主题,而第七章则对英国针对古巴海盗的政策进行了分析。在确定英国政治家为应对海上掠夺威胁而采取的措施时,这四章大量借鉴了政府的来往书,而公开辩论和盎格鲁-西班牙索赔委员会的诉讼程序则对这些措施的有效性进行了评估。鉴于从未从英国的角度研究过西班牙裔美国人独立战争期间的商业袭击活动,因此这项研究将为现有文献增加新的维度。这样,本研究将提供一个平台,从中可以重新评估先前作品的论点,涉及19世纪初期的掠食性,参与该活动的个人的动机以及商业袭击的贡献。独立冲突的结果。但是,以下研究也有可能提出更广泛意义的观点,并有助于对历史其他方面的知识和理解。当前研究的重点是英国在保护英国商人的利益免受掠夺威胁方面的有效性,从而揭示了十九世纪初英国发生的更广泛的社会,政治和经济变化。在西班牙美洲独立战争期间,发生了英国经济政策方向发生深刻变化的时期。该隐和霍普金斯概述了这种变化的性质,并解释了其基础。他们认为,1688年至1850年间,英国是由绅士精英统治的,该精英绅士由伦敦市的土地贵族和金融家之间的联盟组成。该联盟试图以维护特权,公民和平与宪法的方式来偿还国家债务,资助赞助和管理政治制度。在1815年之前,为实现这些目标,英国政府在经济中发挥了贸易保护主义的作用。但是,在拿破仑战争之后,很明显需要进行根本性的改变,以恢复经济的健康,维持民事秩序并转移对18世纪后期开始流传的赞助系统的日益批评。因此,统治阶级开始了重新定义其作用和宗旨的过程,并逐渐开始对宪法,赞助制度,社会立法和经济政策进行改革。在拿破仑战争之后的经济领域,保守党政府的前瞻性成员受到亚当·斯密(Adam Smith)在《国富论》中对重商主义的攻击的鼓舞,他采取了放任自流的态度,并开始逐步将政府从直接参与经济进程中撤出。57到1850年,过渡有效地完成,重商主义让路了进入自由贸易时代。作为D.C.M.普拉特证明,在19世纪剩余时间内,英国政府对英国海外海外贸易的总体利益保持了紧急的官方利益,但对促进个人金融和贸易利益表现出明显的偏见。这项研究有望通过提供案例研究来进一步阐明19世纪初的英国经济政策,以观察这种转变的实际行动并评估其对英国主体生活的重要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    McCarthy Matthew John;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号