首页> 外文OA文献 >'Quality management or management quality?' : an adaptive model of organization as the basis of organizational learning and quality provision
【2h】

'Quality management or management quality?' : an adaptive model of organization as the basis of organizational learning and quality provision

机译:“质量管理还是管理质量?” :一种自适应的组织模型,作为组织学习和质量提供的基础

摘要

This document tells the story of the development of an approach to the management of quality management. Not the more usual "conformance to specification" version of product quality, but that of service quality. In telling this story two main sources have been used, cybernetic theory, and management practice. In telling the story is presented in a linear manner, which is intended to make it easier to follow. That is it begins with a problem, moves to a suggested solution and ends with an application and reflections thereon.Although the project presented here did begin with the problem of service quality management and end with the successful implementation of a management tool, the development of the model that drives the solution was circular. Not unlike the serpent eating its own tail the process of model building was iterative, informed by the results of earlier research and consulting interventions. Because of its circuitous route the research draws on a broad range of theoretical sources, some more obviously or directly relevant than others, but all of which served to enrich the understanding and applicability of the final model.Because the theoretical model moves from cybernetical first principles the practical application it informs does not exhaust its potential. The constraints of the research questions, and the needs of the client, used as the basis for the case study, delilnited the extent to which it was possible to comment formally on its content.Although it has been possible to justifiably answer the questions set, almost by necessity some of the more esoteric elements of the theoretical model remain unproven in the strict sense. However, these elements provided invaluable illustrative insights and have hinted at a rich vein of future research, particularly in the field of computer simulation and the unification of science. The exploration of this potential is, however, beyond the boundary of this project.The main practical outcome of the project is a rigorous approach for the integrated management of quality and organizational effectiveness in the professional service sector. Such an approach has been problematical in the past and led to the situation where service quality was considered to be no different from production quality, evident in the "product and/or service" style of language adopted in the ISO literature. As I argue here (and (with Beckford) elsewhere) this approach is not tenable due to the fundamental differences in the manner of design, consumption and quality assurance between the two. And it is this that has tended to lead to the mechanistic approach to service quality lnanagelnent, e.g., the use of standard "scripts" to be followed during service events (e.g., "Have a nice day... ") .Once this understanding of service quality management was established it was necessary to construct an organizational model to contain it. The basic model chosen was Beer's Viable System Model. However several adaptations were made which allow for a more general, as opposed to strictly neurological, interpretation and to facilitate a more intuitive fit with the technological platform on which it was to be implemented.Following this it was a relatively simple exercise to construct a database tool for the capture and manipulation of data to support organizational activities.As the basis of the project was the development/derivation, through theory, of a practical solution to a 'live' business problem the burden of 'proof' lies in the application of the solution and reflection upon its utility. For this reason a case study is used to demonstrate the model which (and although it went through many formal and informal iterations) was 'signed off' by the client. In addition, the general model was accepted by both a professional body (as an appropriate tool forpractice management) and a national standards body (as the basis for their auditor training).With this final practical validation the story draws to a close. The practical problem of service quality management has been set within a demonstrably rigorous theoretical framework. The framework has provided the basis for, and informed the design of, a management tool. And the tool has been validated in practice.
机译:本文档讲述了质量管理方法发展的故事。不是通常的产品质量“符合规格”版本,而是服务质量版本。在讲这个故事时,使用了两个主要来源,控制论和管理实践。在讲故事时,是以线性方式呈现故事的,目的是使故事更容易理解。就是说,它从一个问题开始,转到建议的解决方案,然后在其上进行应用和思考。尽管此处介绍的项目确实从服务质量管理问题开始,并从成功实施管理工具结束,驱动解决方案的模型是循环的。就像蛇吃了自己的尾巴一样,模型的构建过程是迭代的,这要归功于早期研究和咨询干预的结果。由于其circuit回的路线,本研究借鉴了广泛的理论来源,其中一些理论来源比其他来源更为明显或直接相关,但所有这些都有助于丰富最终模型的理解和适用性。因为理论模型脱离了控制论的第一性原理它所告知的实际应用并没有耗尽其潜力。研究问题的限制以及客户的需求(作为案例研究的基础)确定了可以对其内容进行正式评论的程度。尽管有可能合理地回答所提出的问题,从严格意义上讲,几乎没有必要对理论模型中的某些较深奥的元素进行验证。但是,这些元素提供了宝贵的说明性见解,并暗示了未来研究的丰富脉络,尤其是在计算机仿真和科学统一领域。但是,对这种潜力的探索超出了该项目的范围。该项目的主要实际成果是对专业服务部门的质量和组织有效性进行综合管理的严格方法。这种方法在过去一直是有问题的,并导致这样一种情况,即服务质量与生产质量没有区别,这在ISO文献中采用的“产品和/或服务”语言风格中显而易见。正如我在此处(以及其他地区(与Beckford)一起)所论证的那样,由于两者之间在设计,消耗和质量保证方面存在根本差异,因此这种方法不可行。正是这种趋势导致了对服务质量管理的机械化方法,例如,在服务事件期间要遵循标准的“脚本”(例如,“祝您度过愉快的一天……”)。建立了服务质量管理体系,有必要构建一个包含它的组织模型。选择的基本模型是Beer的可行系统模型。然而,进行了几项改编,以允许更严格的解释而不是严格的神经学解释,并有助于更直观地适应要实施该技术的技术平台。用于捕获和操纵数据以支持组织活动的工具。作为该项目的基础,通过理论开发/推导解决“实时”业务问题的实用解决方案,“证明”的责任在于应用解决方案及其效用的反思。因此,通过案例研究来说明该模型(尽管它经历了许多正式和非正式的迭代)是由客户“签名”的。此外,通用模型已被专业机构(作为进行实践管理的适当工具)和国家标准机构(作为其审计师培训的基础)接受了。最终的实践验证使这一故事告一段落。服务质量管理的实际问题已经在非常严格的理论框架内提出。该框架为管理工具提供了基础并为其提供了信息。并且该工具已在实践中得到验证。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dudley Peter 1957-;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2000
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号