首页> 外文OA文献 >Displaced memory: Oscar Micheaux, Carlos Bulosan, and the process of United States decolonization
【2h】

Displaced memory: Oscar Micheaux, Carlos Bulosan, and the process of United States decolonization

机译:流离失所的记忆:奥斯卡·米歇(Oscar Micheaux),卡洛斯·布洛桑(Carlos Bulosan)和美国非殖民化进程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

"Displaced Memory: Oscar Micheaux, Carlos Bulosan, and the Process of U.S. Decolonization," uses new applications for existing colonial and postcolonial theories in order to explain common incongruities in ethnic minority autobiographies in early twentieth-century America. Using Carlos Bulosan (1914-1956) and Oscar Micheaux's (1894-1951) "fictional autobiographies" as case studies, I argue that the seemingly contradictory coexistence of assimilationist and subversive narratives can be explained when understood as textual representations of the process of decolonization. Reading these narrators as postcolonial subjects, however, would require both a radical rethinking of colonial and postcolonial theory and careful revaluation of early American mythology. While recognizing the United States as a former (or neo-) colonial power poses no insuperable problem for scholars in Philippine American studies, analyzing other disenfranchised ethnic communities in terms of a U.S. colonial context is more problematic. My project addresses precisely this problem: part one begins with the Philippine context and asks why even this overt example of colonization remains unacknowledged within U.S. cultural memory. The answer to this question is grounded in the literary, political and ideological national foundations emergent during nascent U.S. development. In the second part of my project, I stress the necessity of comparing multi-ethnic experiences within parallel historical trajectories, addressing questions about how a U.S. postcolonial theory would become complicated when applied to slavery and its aftermath. I argue that the unique position of displaced colonials occupied by African slaves and the colonial memory instilled in their offspring suggest the applicability of postcolonial theory to the African American community. Questions of U.S. postcoloniality are invariably tethered to multiple perspectives from early literature, from captivity to emancipation and reconstruction. Thus, understanding the ways in which African Americans have been colonized is important not only for re-reading African American literature like that of Micheaux, but for revising American ideological holdovers from the seventeenth century to the present. Read together within the postcolonial context, Bulosan's and Micheaux's views on nation, race, masculinity and women take on new significance.
机译:“流离失所的记忆:奥斯卡·米歇(Oscar Micheaux),卡洛斯·布洛桑(Carlos Bulosan)和美国的非殖民化进程”对现有的殖民和后殖民理论使用了新的应用,目的是解释20世纪初美国少数民族自传中的常见不一致之处。我以卡洛斯·布洛桑(Carlos Bulosan(1914-1956)和奥斯卡·米歇(Oscar Micheaux)(1894-1951)的“小说自传”为个案研究,认为当将同化和颠覆性叙事看似矛盾并存时,可以理解为非殖民化过程的文本表示。但是,将这些叙述者读为后殖民题材,既需要对殖民和后殖民理论进行彻底的重新思考,也需要对美国早期神话进行认真的重新评估。尽管承认美国是前殖民(或新殖民地)权力对菲律宾美国研究人员来说没有不可逾越的问题,但从美国殖民地角度分析其他被剥夺权利的族裔社区就更成问题了。我的项目正好解决了这个问题:第一部分从菲律宾的背景开始,并问为什么为什么在美国文化记忆中甚至连这种明显的殖民化例子都没有得到承认。这个问题的答案是建立在新生的美国发展过程中形成的文学,政治和意识形态国家基础之上的。在我的项目的第二部分中,我强调有必要在平行的历史轨迹中比较多民族的经历,解决有关美国后殖民理论在应用于奴隶制及其后果时将如何变得复杂的问题。我认为,非洲奴隶占领的流离失所殖民者的独特地位以及在其后代中灌输的殖民记忆表明,后殖民理论对非裔美国人社区具有适用性。从囚禁到解放和重建,从早期文献来看,美国后殖民问题总是被束缚于多种观点。因此,了解非洲裔美国人的殖民方式不仅对于重新阅读米歇(Micheaux)这样的非裔美国人文学很重要,而且对于修改从17世纪到现在的美国意识形态的保留很重要。在后殖民时代的背景下一起阅读,Bulosan和Micheaux对民族,种族,男子气概和女性的看法具有新的意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pierce Linda M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号