首页> 外文OA文献 >People above scenery: The struggle over the Grand Canyon dams, 1963-1968
【2h】

People above scenery: The struggle over the Grand Canyon dams, 1963-1968

机译:风景秀丽的人们:大峡谷水坝的斗争,1963-1968年

摘要

Between 1963-1968, western water interests sought to construct two dams in Grand Canyon as part of the Central Arizona Project. The Sierra Club led a national opposition campaign that environmental historians argue defeated the dams. Environmentalists claimed a great victory, and scholars and popular writers lauded the Sierra Club as the savior of Grand Canyon. Despite the laurels heaped upon the Sierra Club, its ability to mobilize public opinion did not enable it to appreciably influence Congress where the issue was actually decided. California politicians thwarted Arizona's attempts to build the project for decades, and when Stewart Udall, a former Arizona congressman became Interior Secretary in 1960, he promoted a regional plan predicated upon water importation from the Columbia River to gain California's support. Washington Senator Henry Jackson, the powerful Interior Committee Chairman, opposed the scheme, and California water strategists used Jackson's opposition and the environmentalists' campaign as pretexts to withdraw their backing in autumn of 1966. Knowing that Arizona's disproportionate political influence would end with his and Senator Carl Hayden's impending retirements, the pragmatic Udall obtained congressional passage of a bare-bones CAP without dams just months before he and Senator Hayden left office in 1968. However, the anti-dam effort was an important event in American environmental history because it propelled the Sierra Club to the undisputed leadership of the environmental movement. Although most conservation organizations curtailed their lobbying efforts after the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Federal Lobbying Act in 1954, the club continued its legislative agenda into the next decade. When the IRS revoked the club's tax deductible status after David Brower placed ads in national newspapers in June of 1966, hundreds of thousands of people wrote Congress, accusing the government of violating the club's constitutional rights. The anti-dam campaign drew strong support from free speech, anti-war, and civil liberties advocates, and the Sierra Club used this public sympathy to solidify its position of environmental leadership after Congress passed the National Environmental Policy Act in 1970, giving environmental advocates access to the policy-making process for the first time.
机译:在1963年至1968年之间,作为亚利桑那中央项目的一部分,西方水利团体寻求在大峡谷建造两个水坝。塞拉俱乐部(Sierra Club)领导了一场全国反对运动,环境历史学家认为该运动击败了大坝。环保主义者宣称取得了巨大的胜利,学者和流行作家称赞塞拉俱乐部为大峡谷的救世主。尽管塞拉俱乐部饱受赞誉,但它动员公众舆论的能力并未使其对实际决定该问题的国会产生可观的影响。加利福尼亚州的政客挫败了亚利桑那州数十年来试图建设该项目的企图。1960年,前亚利桑那州议员斯图尔特·乌达尔(Stewart Udall)成为内政部长时,他推动了一项基于哥伦比亚河水进口的区域计划,以获得加利福尼亚州的支持。华盛顿参议员亨利·杰克逊(Henry Jackson),有力的内政委员会主席,反对该计划,加利福尼亚水战略家以杰克逊的反对派和环保主义者的竞选活动为借口,在1966年秋天撤回了支持。卡尔·海顿(Carl Hayden)即将退休,务实的乌德尔(Udall)在1968年他和参议员海登(Hayden)卸任前几个月就获得了国会通过的无水坝的基本法案。塞拉俱乐部以无可争议的环保运动领导。尽管在最高法院于1954年维持《联邦游说法案》的合宪性之后,大多数环境保护组织都减少了游说工作,但该俱乐部将立法议程延续到了下一个十年。 1966年6月,大卫·布劳(David Brower)在国家报纸上刊登广告后,美国国税局(IRS)取消了俱乐部的免税地位,成千上万的人写信给国会,指责政府侵犯了俱乐部的宪法权利。反水坝运动得到了言论自由,反战和公民自由倡导者的大力支持,在国会于1970年通过《国家环境政策法案》之后,塞拉俱乐部利用公众的同情心巩固了其在环境领域的领导地位,为环境保护主义者提供了支持首次进入决策过程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pearson Byron Eugene 1960-;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1998
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号