首页> 外文OA文献 >The NOURISHED randomised controlled trial comparing mentalisation-based treatment for eating disorders (MBT-ED) with specialist supportive clinical management (SSCM-ED) for patients with eating disorders and symptoms of borderline personality disorder
【2h】

The NOURISHED randomised controlled trial comparing mentalisation-based treatment for eating disorders (MBT-ED) with specialist supportive clinical management (SSCM-ED) for patients with eating disorders and symptoms of borderline personality disorder

机译:一项NOURISHED随机对照试验,比较了针对进食障碍和边缘性人格障碍患者的进食障碍的心理化治疗(MBT-ED)与专家支持性临床管理(SSCM-ED)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: In this multi-centre RCT we compared modified Mentalization Based Therapy (MBT-ED) to Specialist Supportive Clinical Management (SSCM-ED) in patients with Eating disorders (ED) and Borderline Personality Disorder symptoms (BPD). This group of patients presents complex challenges to clinical services and a treatment which addresses their multiple problems has the potential to improve outcome. MBT has been shown to be effective in improving outcome in patients with BPD, but its use has not been reported in ED. Methods: 68 eligible participants were randomised to MBT-ED or SSCM-ED. The primary outcome measure was the Global Score on the Eating Disorders Examination. Secondary outcomes included measures of BPD symptoms (the ZAN-BPD), general psychiatric state, quality of life and service utilization. Participants were assessed at baseline and 6, 12 and 18 months after randomization. Analysis was performed using linear mixed models. Results: Only 15 participants (22%) completed the 18 month follow-up. Early drop-out occurred significantly more in the SSCM-ED group. Dropout did not vary with treatment model later in therapy and was sometimes attributed to participants moving away. There was higher drop-out amongst smokers and those with higher neuroticism scores. 47.1% of participants in the MBT-ED arm and 37.1% in the SSCM-ED arm attended at least 50% of therapy sessions offered. Amongst those remaining in the trial, at 12 and 18-months MBT-ED was associated with a greater reduction in Shape Concern and Weight Concern in the Eating Disorders Examination compared to SSCM-ED. At 6, 12 and 18 months there was a decline of ED and BPD symptoms in both groups combined. Ten participants were reported as having had adverse events during the trial, mostly self harm, and there was one death, attributed as “unexplained” by the coroner. Conclusions: The high drop-out rate made interpretation of the results difficult. Greater involvement of research staff in clinical management might have improved compliance with both therapy and research assessment. MBT-ED may have had an impact on core body image psychopathology. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN51304415, assigned 19th April 2011.
机译:背景:在这个多中心RCT中,我们对饮食失调(ED)和边缘性人格障碍症状(BPD)患者的改良心理治疗(MBT-ED)与专家支持临床管理(SSCM-ED)进行了比较。这组患者对临床服务提出了复杂的挑战,解决他们多个问题的治疗方法可能会改善治疗效果。 MBT已显示可有效改善BPD患者的预后,但ED中尚未报道其使用。方法:将68名合格参与者随机分为MBT-ED或SSCM-ED。主要结果指标是饮食失调考试的全球评分。次要结果包括测量BPD症状(ZAN-BPD),总体精神状态,生活质量和服务利用情况。在基线,随机分组后的6、12和18个月对参与者进行评估。使用线性混合模型进行分析。结果:只有15名参与者(22%)完成了18个月的随访。在SSCM-ED组中,早期辍学的发生率明显更高。辍学率在以后的治疗中不会随治疗模式而变化,有时归因于参与者的离开。吸烟者和神经质得分较高的吸烟者辍学率更高。 MBT-ED组的47.1%参与者和SSCM-ED组的37.1%参加了至少50%的治疗课程。与SSCM-ED相比,在剩余的试验中,在12个月和18个月时,MBT-ED与进食障碍检查中形状关注和体重关注的减少程度更大有关。在第6、12和18个月时,两组的ED和BPD症状均下降。据报告,有10名参与者在试验期间发生了不良事件,主要是自我伤害,有1例死亡被死因裁判官解释为“无法解释”。结论:高辍学率使结果难以解释。研究人员更多地参与临床管理可能会改善对治疗和研究评估的依从性。 MBT-ED可能对核心人体图像心理病理学有影响。试用注册:当前控制的试用:ISRCTN51304415,于2011年4月19日分配。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号