首页> 外文OA文献 >Europeanization subverted? The European Union's promotion of good governance and the fight against corruption in the Southern Caucasus
【2h】

Europeanization subverted? The European Union's promotion of good governance and the fight against corruption in the Southern Caucasus

机译:欧洲化被颠覆了吗?欧洲联盟在南高加索地区促进善政和反腐败斗争

摘要

In order to foster peace, stability and prosperity in its near abroad, the European Union has invoked the European Neighbourhood Policy that seeks to transform the domestic structures of the Newly Independent States in the post-Soviet space thus building a “ring of friends” that share European norms and principles of democracy, rule of the law, market economy, and good governance. Empirical evidence, however, suggests that the EU’s capacity to hit across its borders and to realize its reform agenda seems limited. Moreover, most neighborhood countries appear to be stuck in transition and suffer from serious problems of both weak state capacity and defect democracy. Hence, EU efforts may also bear the danger of unintended and negative effects on the domestic structures of states, as its policies and institutions do not only empower liberal reform coalitions, to the extent that they exist in the first place, but can also bolster the power of incumbent authoritarian and corrupt elites. This paper intends to capture this “dark side of Europeanization” (Schimmelfennig 2007). It thus conceptualizes ENP as a political opportunity structure that provides opportunities and constraints to both supporters and opponents of the European Union’s reform agenda. Which of the two ultimately get empowered depends not only on the EU’s capacity to push for reforms but also on the pull of domestic actors.
机译:为了促进其邻近国家的和平,稳定与繁荣,欧盟援引了《欧洲邻国政策》,该政策旨在改变后苏联时期新独立国家的国内结构,从而建立“朋友圈”,分享欧洲的民主规范和原则,法治,市场经济和善政。但是,经验证据表明,欧盟跨越国界和实现其改革议程的能力似乎有限。此外,大多数邻国似乎陷于转型之中,并遭受着国家能力薄弱和民主缺失的严重问题。因此,欧盟的努力也可能会给国家的国内结构带来意想不到的负面影响,因为它的政策和机构不仅赋予了自由改革联盟以权力,而且它们可以首先支持它们。现任专制政权和腐败精英的力量。本文旨在抓住这一“欧洲化的阴暗面”(Schimmelfennig 2007)。因此,它把ENP概念化为一种政治机会结构,为欧盟改革议程的支持者和反对者提供机遇和制约。最终获得授权的是这两者中的哪一个,不仅取决于欧盟推动改革的能力,还取决于国内参与者的吸引力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Börzel Tanja A.; Pamuk;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号