首页> 外文OA文献 >Techno-utopianism and the Orient in Russian revolutionary culture
【2h】

Techno-utopianism and the Orient in Russian revolutionary culture

机译:技术乌托邦主义与俄罗斯革命文化中的东方

摘要

The magnitude of the hopes pinned on technology in early twentieth-century Russia was directly proportional to its relative backwardness in this area. The nation saw itself on the brink of an historic clash between the age-old ways of the Slavic peasant and the advances of the industrialized West. In Russia the debate over technological progress is intimately involved with the issue of the nation’s relationship with Europe – or in broader terms, the eternal question “East or West?” In the opening decades of the twentieth century this multifarious dichotomy achieves even greater prominence, as evidenced by a range of revolutionary-era writers, from Symbolists such as Blok and Belyi, to proletarian poets such as Gastev, and early Soviet novelists such as Pilnyak, Zamyatin, and Platonov. A key factor in their problematization of the Orientalist (and Bolshevik) dictum of the backward East is a vision of technological apocalypse, rather than progress, in which Russia engages in a Nietzschean struggle to defeat technology by its own means, and thus escape teleology – and history – altogether.
机译:二十世纪初,俄罗斯寄希望于技术的希望的大小与该领域相对落后的程度成正比。在斯拉夫农民的古老方式与西方工业化国家的进步之间,国家处于历史性冲突的边缘。在俄罗斯,有关技术进步的辩论与该国与欧洲的关系密切相关,或更广泛地说,是永恒的问题“东方还是西方?”。在二十世纪初的几十年中,这种多元化的二分法取得了更大的成就,这一点从一系列革命时代的作家中得到了证明,从诸如布洛克和贝利的象征主义者,到无产阶级诗人如加斯捷夫,以及早期的苏联小说家如皮尔尼亚克, Zamyatin和Platonov。他们对落后的东方主义者(和布尔什维克)的教义进行质疑的一个关键因素是对技术末日的看法,而不是对进步的看法,其中俄罗斯参与了尼采斗争,以自己的方式击败技术,从而逃避了目的论的挑战–和历史-总共。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hellebust Rolf;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号