首页> 外文OA文献 >Simplifi ed antibiotic regimens for treatment of clinicaludsevere infection in the outpatient setting when referral isudnot possible for young infants in Pakistan (Simplifi edudAntibiotic Therapy Trial SATT): a randomised, open-label,udequivalence trial
【2h】

Simplifi ed antibiotic regimens for treatment of clinicaludsevere infection in the outpatient setting when referral isudnot possible for young infants in Pakistan (Simplifi edudAntibiotic Therapy Trial SATT): a randomised, open-label,udequivalence trial

机译:简化的抗生素方案治疗临床 ud转诊时在门诊环境中发生严重感染巴基斯坦的幼儿不可能(简体版 ud抗生素治疗试验SATT):随机,开放标签, ud等价审判

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Parenteral antibiotic therapy for young infants (aged 0–59 days) with suspected sepsis is sometimes notudavailable or feasible in countries with high neonatal mortality. Outpatient treatment could save lives in such settings.udWe aimed to assess the equivalence of two simplifi ed antibiotic regimens, comprising fewer injections and oral ratherudthan parenteral administration, compared with a reference treatment for young infants with clinical severe infection.udMethods We undertook the Simplifi ed Antibiotic Therapy Trial (SATT), a three-arm, randomised, open-label,udequivalence trial in fi ve communities in Karachi, Pakistan. We enrolled young infants (aged 0–59 days) who eitherudpresented at a primary health-care clinic or were identifi ed by a community health worker with signs of clinical severeudinfection. We included infants who were not critically ill and whose family refused admission. We randomly assignedudinfants to either intramuscular procaine benzylpenicillin and gentamicin once a day for 7 days (reference); oraludamoxicillin twice daily and intramuscular gentamicin once a day for 7 days; or intramuscular procaine benzylpenicillinudand gentamicin once a day for 2 days followed by oral amoxicillin twice daily for 5 days. The primary outcome wasudtreatment failure within 7 days of enrolment and the primary analysis was per protocol. We judged experimentaludtreatments as effi cacious as the reference if the upper bound of the 95% CI for the diff erence in treatment failure wasudless than 5·0. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01027429.udFindings Between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 26, 2013, 2780 infants were deemed eligible for the trial, of whom 2453 (88%)udwere enrolled. Because of inadequate clinical follow-up or treatment adherence, 2251 infants were included in theudper-protocol analysis. 820 infants (747 per protocol) were assigned the reference treatment of procaine benzylpenicillinudand gentamicin, 816 (751 per protocol) were allocated amoxicillin and gentamicin, and 817 (753 per protocol) wereudassigned procaine benzylpenicillin, gentamicin, and amoxicillin. Treatment failure within 7 days of enrolment wasudreported in 90 (12%) infants who received procaine benzylpenicillin and gentamicin (reference), 76 (10%) of those givenudamoxicillin and gentamicin (risk diff erence with reference –1·9, 95% CI –5·1 to 1·3), and 99 (13%) of those treated withudprocaine benzylpenicillin, gentamicin, and amoxicillin (risk diff erence with reference 1·1, –2·3 to 4·5).udInterpretation Two simplifi ed antibiotic regimens requiring fewer injections are equivalent to a reference treatmentudfor young infants with signs of clinical severe infection but without signs of critical illness. The use of these simplifi edudregimens has the potential to increase access to treatment for sick young infants who cannot be referred to hospital.
机译:背景技术在新生儿死亡率高的国家,对怀疑患有败血症的幼儿(0-59天)进行肠胃外抗生素治疗有时是不可行的或不可行的。在这种情况下,门诊治疗可以挽救生命。 ud我们的目标是评估两种简单的抗生素治疗方案的等效性,与具有临床严重感染的婴儿的参考治疗方案相比,注射剂量和口服剂量要比胃肠外给药少。进行了简化抗生素治疗试验(SATT),这是一项在巴基斯坦卡拉奇的五个社区进行的三臂,随机,开放标签,等效性试验。我们纳入了在初级卫生保健诊所就诊或由社区卫生工作者鉴定为临床上有严重感染的迹象的0至59天的幼儿。我们纳入了并非重病且其家人拒绝入院的婴儿。我们将 udinfants随机分配给肌内普鲁卡因苄青霉素和庆大霉素,连续7天(参考);口服达莫西林每天两次,每天一次肌内注射庆大霉素,持续7天;或每天一次肌内注射普鲁卡因苄青霉素 udand庆大霉素,连续2天,随后每天口服阿莫西林2次,连续5天。主要结果是入组后7天内的治疗失败,主要分析结果是根据方案进行的。如果治疗失败差异的95%CI上限不超过5·0,我们认为实验性 udrations作为有效的参考。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,编号为NCT01027429。 udFindings。在2010年1月1日至2013年12月26日期间,有2780例婴儿被视为有资格参加该试验,其中2453例(88%)参加了该试验。由于缺乏足够的临床随访或治疗依从性, upro-protocol分析中纳入了2251例婴儿。分配了820例婴儿(747方案)的普鲁卡因苄青霉素 ud和庆大霉素的参考治疗,816(每种方案751)分配了阿莫西林和庆大霉素的治疗,817(每个方案753)分配了普鲁卡因苄青霉素,庆大霉素和阿莫西林的治疗。入选后7天内治疗失败的报道为:接受普鲁卡因苄青霉素和庆大霉素(参考)的婴儿90例(12%),接受达莫西林和庆大霉素的婴儿中76例(10%)(风险差异参考–1·9, 95%CI –5·1至1·3),其中99%(13%)接受 udprocaine苄青霉素,庆大霉素和阿莫西林治疗(风险差异见参考文献1·1,–2·3至4·5)两种简单的抗生素治疗方案需要更少的注射量,相当于具有临床严重感染症状但没有严重疾病迹象的婴儿的参考治疗。使用这些简化的/ udregimens可能会增加无法转诊到医院的生病婴儿的治疗机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号