首页> 外文OA文献 >Structural styles across the Nankai accretionary prism revealed from LWD borehole images and their correlation with seismic profile and core data: Results from NanTroSEIZE Stage 1 expeditions
【2h】

Structural styles across the Nankai accretionary prism revealed from LWD borehole images and their correlation with seismic profile and core data: Results from NanTroSEIZE Stage 1 expeditions

机译:LWD钻孔图像揭示了南开增生棱镜上的构造样式及其与地震剖面和岩心数据的相关性:NanTroSEIZE第1阶段考察的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Four drill sites of IODP NanTroSEIZE Stage 1 Expedition transected the Nankai Trough, offshore SW Japan, from the deformation front to the Kumano fore-arc basin. Borehole resistivity images from the logging-while-drilling (LWD) data were analyzed to extract orientations of faults, fractures, and bedding planes to examine the structural styles. On the basis of these features, drilling intervals were classified into fore-arc basin deposits, surface slope sediments, and deformed accretionary wedge, and these can be compared with characteristics from seismic profiles and core structural data. Bedding orientations identified in these three data sets are generally comparable, but the difference in resolution between the data sets produces different results in interpretation where geology is highly deformed or includes finer internal structures. Faults can also be correlated between these three data sets, but the differences in their appearance require special attention for accurate correlation. Many faults imaged in seismic profiles actually consist of microfracture systems, as shown in cores, that can also be identified in borehole images. Some clear faults in seismic profiles cannot be identified in borehole images, probably because of their minimal resistivity contrast with the surrounding rocks or a more complex fault zone at the borehole scale. These results suggest that these three data sets can be used to extract not only the general structure but also different styles of deformation at different scales from core samples (mm to cm), to LWD (mm to 10 m), to seismic (10 m to tens of km). This correlation requires a deep understanding of the resolution and shortcomings of each methodology.
机译:IODP NanTroSEIZE第1阶段考察的四个钻探场从变形前缘到熊野前弧盆地横穿了日本西南海上的Nankai槽。分析了随钻测井(LWD)数据中的井眼电阻率图像,以提取断层,裂缝和层理面的方向,以检查构造样式。根据这些特征,将钻井间隔分为前弧盆地沉积物,地表斜坡沉积物和变形增生楔,并可以与地震剖面和岩心构造数据的特征进行比较。在这三个数据集中确定的层理方向通常是可比较的,但是在地质高度变形或包含更精细的内部结构的解释中,数据集之间的分辨率差异会产生不同的结果。断层也可以在这三个数据集之间建立关联,但是在外观上的差异需要特别注意以进行精确的关联。如岩心所示,地震剖面中成像的许多断层实际上是由微裂缝系统组成的,也可以在井眼图像中识别出来。地震剖面中一些清晰的断层无法在井眼图像中识别出来,这可能是因为它们与周围岩石的电阻率最小,或者井眼范围内的断层区域更为复杂。这些结果表明,这三个数据集不仅可用于提取总体结构,而且还可用于从岩心样本(毫米至厘米),随钻测井(毫米至10 m),地震(10 m到几十公里)。这种关联需要对每种方法的分辨率和缺点有深入的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号