首页> 外文OA文献 >Should directors be pursued for insolvent trading where a company has entered into a deed of company arrangement?
【2h】

Should directors be pursued for insolvent trading where a company has entered into a deed of company arrangement?

机译:在公司订立公司安排契据的情况下,是否应聘请董事进行无力偿债交易?

摘要

This article examines the tension in Australia between the insolvent trading prohibition and the voluntary administration regime provided for in the Corporations Act. The tension exists since the former seeks to prosecuteuddirectors for incurring debts that the company cannot pay whereas the latter provisions seek to allow a company in financial distress to resolve the means of dealing with financial difficulty with its creditors and move forwardudon an agreed basis. The case of John Elliott is the first case in Australian corporate law history concerning the relevant provisions where an agreement was made with creditors, after which the director was prosecuted pursuant to the insolvent trading prohibition.
机译:本文探讨了澳大利亚在无力偿债交易禁令与《公司法》规定的自愿管理制度之间的紧张关系。之所以存在这种紧张关系,是因为前者寻求起诉 uddirectors导致公司无法偿还的债务,而后者的规定则试图允许处于财务困境的公司解决与债权人应对财务困难的方法,并推动 udon基础。约翰·埃利奥特(John Elliott)案是澳大利亚公司法史上有关与债权人达成协议的有关条款的第​​一起案件,此后,该董事根据无力偿债交易禁令被起诉。

著录项

  • 作者

    Anderson Colin; Morrison David;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号