首页> 外文OA文献 >States’ membership in energy Inter-Governmental Organizations (IGOs): trade, alliances and regulation
【2h】

States’ membership in energy Inter-Governmental Organizations (IGOs): trade, alliances and regulation

机译:州在能源政府间组织(IGO)中的成员资格:贸易,联盟和监管

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Chapter 1: Intergovernmental organisations (IGOs) have emerged as prominent actors in the global marketplace since the median decades of the twentieth century. The unique role of energy in informing global trade flows, supply and demand, and overall wealth distribution renders IGOs interacting with the energy sector particularly critical to shaping the worldwide economic order; and yet, a quantitative system of classifying IGOs has yet to be articulated. Grounded in rational design and rational choice theory, this body of research selects a population of IGOs based on the following criteria: formal agreement between sovereign states, independent institutions or organizations dependent upon IGOs, energy-focused agenda, permanent bureaucratic system, and active-status. Given these criteria, a model is articulated for classifying IGOs interacting within the energy sector, with conclusions drawn regarding links between apparent, participatory variability of IGOs and environmental forces. Key conclusions include the increase in consumption-driven IGOs and decrease of production-driven IGOs which is indicative of the interconnectivity of market trends and the quantity and function of energy-focused IGO agendas. - udChapter 2: Why do states choose to join and form IGOs that regulate energy policy? In this paper we make three specific contributions to the literature on international cooperation and diffusion. First, we show that countries form and join energy IGOs in response to memberships previously gained by direct competitors among oil and gas producers and consumers. Moreover, we demonstrate that energy IGOs diffuse among countries that share oil and gas pipelines. Finally, we provide evidence that the institutional design of established energy IGOs impacts the development of their membership network. To test these hypotheses, we rely on original data on oil and gas pipelines and the design of energy IGOs as well as on a newly compiled dataset that includes 152 countries and covers 38 years (1970-2007). We employ both network analysis and spatial econometrics. - udChapter 3: The goal of this paper is to provide an explanation for the formation of energy intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) among energy consumer or consumer/producer countries, predicated on the need to make alliances for energy security. The paper uses a two-stage model to explain the formation of energy IGOs and following this formation, the actions of the state within the IGO. The first stage, called the bargaining stage, involves the negotiation process for formation of the energy IGO, which is based on existing alliances and shared energy concerns. The second stage, called the enforcement stage, involves the actions of the state within the IGO, including the formation of shared energy security frameworks and common policies, based on shared energy concerns and infrastructure development needs. Two qualitative analytical case studies, the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), are used to demonstrate the use of this model and provide support for the hypotheses. - udChapter 4: This research addresses the national-level effects on energy competition that occur when a National Regulatory Authority (NRA) enters a European Network of Energy Regulators (ENER) competition in the electricity and gas sectors. The approach chosen uses a policy making model with four actors (NRA, Industry, Government, and European Commission) and one instrument (ENER), based on the previous work of Putnam (1988). This policy model is demonstrated qualitatively using selected case studies of this situation, including the Czech Republic‘s adaptation to CEER standards and Spain and the creation of ACER. For both case studies, changes in conditions of competition, accountability, independence, and transparency are assessed. These results show that the policy model as constructed does provide explanatory value for an increase in competition in the energy sectors of member states of ENER through the mechanisms of increasing accountability, transparency, and independence of policy decision-making.
机译:第1章:自20世纪中叶以来,政府间组织(IGO)已成为全球市场上的杰出参与者。能源在告知全球贸易流量,供需和整体财富分配方面的独特作用使政府间组织与能源部门的互动对于塑造全球经济秩序尤为关键;然而,尚未阐明对政府间组织进行分类的定量系统。基于理性设计和理性选择理论,该研究机构根据以下标准选择了一批政府间组织:主权国家,依赖政府间组织的独立机构或组织之间的正式协议,以能源为中心的议程,永久性官僚体系以及积极的状态。根据这些标准,提出了一个用于对能源部门中相互作用的政府间组织进行分类的模型,并得出了有关政府间组织的明显,参与性变化与环境力量之间联系的结论。主要结论包括以消费为导向的政府间组织的增加和以生产为导向的政府间组织的减少,这表明市场趋势与以能源为中心的政府间组织议程的数量和功能相互关联。第2章:为什么国家选择加入并组建规范能源政策的IGO?在本文中,我们对有关国际合作与传播的文献做出了三点具体的贡献。首先,我们表明,各国是为响应石油和天然气生产商和消费者之间直接竞争对手先前获得的成员资格而成立并加入能源IGO的。此外,我们证明了能源政府间组织在共享石油和天然气管道的国家之间扩散。最后,我们提供证据表明已建立的能源IGO的机构设计会影响其成员网络的发展。为了检验这些假设,我们依赖于石油和天然气管道的原始数据以及能源IGO的设计以及包括152个国家,涵盖38年(1970-2007年)的最新数据集。我们同时使用网络分析和空间计量经济学。第三章:本文的目的是为能源消费者或消费者/生产者国家之间的能源政府间组织(IGO)的成立提供解释,其前提是需要为能源安全建立联盟。本文使用一个两阶段模型来解释能源IGO的形成,并在此形成之后解释IGO内部国家的行动。第一阶段称为讨价还价阶段,涉及建立能源IGO的谈判过程,该过程基于现有的联盟和共同的能源问题。第二阶段称为执行阶段,涉及政府在政府间组织内的行动,包括基于共同的能源问题和基础设施发展需求,形成共同的能源安全框架和共同政策。国际能源署(IEA)和上海合作组织(SCO)进行了两个定性分析案例研究,以证明该模型的使用并为假设提供支持。第4章:这项研究解决了国家监管机构(NRA)进入电力和天然气行业的欧洲能源监管机构网络(ENER)竞争时在国家层面对能源竞争的影响。在Putnam(1988)以前的工作的基础上,选择的方法使用了具有四个参与者(NRA,工业,政府和欧洲委员会)和一个工具(ENER)的决策模型。通过选择针对这种情况的案例研究,定性地证明了该政策模型,包括捷克共和国对CEER标准的适应和西班牙的成立以及ACER的创建。对于这两个案例研究,都评估了竞争条件,问责制,独立性和透明度的变化。这些结果表明,所构建的政策模型确实通过增加问责制,透明度和政策决策独立性的机制,为增加ENER成员国能源部门的竞争提供了解释价值。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lenzi Veronica;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号