首页> 外文OA文献 >The Market for Legal Education and Freedom of Association: Why the u22Solomon Amendmentu22 Is Constitutional and Law Schools Are Not Expressive Associations
【2h】

The Market for Legal Education and Freedom of Association: Why the u22Solomon Amendmentu22 Is Constitutional and Law Schools Are Not Expressive Associations

机译:法学教育和结社自由的市场:为什么《所罗门修正案》是宪法的,法学院不是表达性的协会

摘要

This term the Supreme Court will confront the constitutionality of the Solomon Amendment, which mandates equal access for military recruiters at universities that accept federal funding. The Third Circuit previously held the statute unconstitutional. This Article argues that the Court should reverse and uphold the statute because the lower court failed to consider the cartelized nature of legal education and so assumed that law schools are u22expressive associationsu22 entitled to assert First Amendment claims; the court also failed to give proper deference to Congressu27s exercise of its Article I power to raise and support armies and over-valued law facultiesu27 interest in career services offices.
机译:这个任期,最高法院将面对所罗门修正案的宪法规定,该修正案要求接受联邦资助的大学中的军事征募人员享有平等的机会。第三巡回法院先前认为该法规违宪。该条认为,法院应撤销并遵守该法规,因为下级法院没有考虑法律教育的卡特尔化性质,因此假定法学院是有权主张第一修正案主张的表达性协会;法院还没有适当尊重国会行使其第一条权力以提高和支持军队以及对职业服务办公室的重视的法律力量的行使。

著录项

  • 作者

    Morriss Andrew P.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号