首页> 外文OA文献 >Functional networks of within- and cross-modal divided attention
【2h】

Functional networks of within- and cross-modal divided attention

机译:模态内和跨模态注意力的功能网络

摘要

In modern neuropsychology attention is subdivided into different domains (Fernandez-Duque & Posner, 2001; Posner & Boies, 1971; Posner & Rafal, 1987; Sturm, 2005; van Zomeren & Brouwer, 1994). One of these domains is divided attention, which describes the ability to process two or more different tasks at the same time. According to Wickens´ (1984) multiple resources theory, processing two tasks simultaneously presented in the same sensory modality (within-modal) is more difficult than processing two tasks presented in two different sensory modalities (cross-modal). Furthermore, many experimental studies demonstrated age-related differences in different divided attention tasks (Brouwer et al., 1991; Levitt et al., 2006; Ponds et al., 1988; McDowd & Craik, 1988; Somberg & Salthouse, 1982; Coburn et al., 2006). Compared with young adults, older adults showed a significantly decreased ability to divide attention. Modern functional imaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provide the opportunity to identify brain structures which are linked to known psychological processes and effects. This thesis describes two different fMRI-experiments dealing with the execution of divided attention tasks. In the first experiment, we were interested in distinguishing the cortical representations of within-modal and cross-modal divided attention tasks. Sixteen healthy male subjects aged between 21 and 30 years underwent two within-modal (auditory/auditory, visual/visual) and one cross-modal (auditory/visual) divided attention task, as well as related selective attention control conditions. After subtraction of the corresponding control tasks the three divided attention tasks, irrespective of sensory modality, revealed significant activation in a right hemisphere network involving the prefrontal cortex, the inferior parietal cortex and the claustrum. Under the cross-modal condition, however, the frontal and parietal activation was more extended and more bilateral and there was also stronger right hemisphere activation of the anterior cingulate gyrus and the thalamus. In comparison to the within-modal conditions additional bilateral frontal and left inferior parietal activation was found for the cross-modal one. The supplementary fronto-parietal, anterior cingulate gyrus and thalamus activation in the auditory/visual condition could be argued to reflect an additional demand for coordination of two ongoing cross-modal cognitive processes. In the second fMRI-experiment, we were interested in detecting aging effects possibly causing age-related differences in cortical representations of within-modal and cross-modal divided attention tasks. A young group (aged 21 to 39 years) and an old group (aged 51 to 74 years) each comprising sixteen healthy male subjects underwent one cross-modal (auditory/visual) and two within-modal (auditory/auditory; visual/visual) divided attention tasks like in the first experiment. During the cross-modal task, the old group revealed stronger divided attention specific bilateral activation in inferior and middle frontal areas, in the cingulate gyrus and in the inferior parietal lobule as well as in the left claustrum than the young group. In the old group the right inferior parietal lobule was also stronger activated while performing the two within-modal tasks, indicating that in older people this specific brain structure is highly involved in divided attention irrespective of sensory modality. We assume that the described additional activation in the old group reflects compensatory effects caused by the greater demand for attentional resources in order to regulate the system. On the other hand, the young group only showed additional activation in the thalamus during the cross-modal task. This might represent a more bottom-up organized processing of divided attention tasks.
机译:在现代神经心理学中,注意力被分为不同的领域(Fernandez-Duque和Posner,2001; Posner和Boies,1971; Posner和Rafal,1987; Sturm,2005; van Zomeren&Brouwer,1994)。这些领域之一是注意力分散,它描述了同时处理两个或多个不同任务的能力。根据Wickens(1984)的多资源理论,与同时处理以两种不同的感觉模态(跨模态)呈现的两个任务相比,同时处理以相同的感觉模态(模态内)呈现的两个任务要困难得多。此外,许多实验研究表明,在不同的分散注意力任务中,年龄相关的差异(Brouwer等,1991; Levitt等,2006; Ponds等,1988; McDowd&Craik,1988; Somberg&Salthouse,1982; Coburn等人,2006)。与年轻人相比,老年人的注意力分散能力明显下降。现代功能成像技术(例如功能磁共振成像(fMRI))为识别与已知心理过程和效应相关的大脑结构提供了机会。本文描述了两种不同的功能磁共振成像实验,分别处理注意力分散任务。在第一个实验中,我们对区分模态内和跨模态的分散注意力任务的皮层表现感兴趣。 16名年龄在21至30岁之间的健康男性受试者经历了两种内模(听觉/听觉,视觉/视觉)和一种跨模态(听觉/视觉)的分散注意力任务,以及相关的选择性注意力控制条件。减去相应的控制任务后,无论感觉方式如何,三个分开的注意力任务都显示出右半球网络中的明显激活,该网络涉及前额叶皮层,顶下皮层和锁骨。然而,在交叉模态条件下,额叶和顶叶的激活更加扩展并且更加双侧,并且前扣带回和丘脑的右半球激活也更强。与模态内条件相比,交叉模态又发现了双侧额叶和左下壁顶叶活化。在听觉/视觉条件下,额叶顶叶,前扣带回和丘脑激活可能被认为反映了对两个正在进行的跨模式认知过程的协调的额外需求。在第二项fMRI实验中,我们感兴趣的是检测衰老效应,这些衰老效应可能导致模态内和跨模态的分散注意力任务的皮质表征中与年龄相关的差异。一个青年组(21至39岁)和一个老年组(51至74岁),每个组包括16名健康男性受试者,分别接受了一种交叉模式(听觉/视觉)和两个内部模式(听觉/听觉;视觉/视觉) )将注意力分散在第一个实验中。在跨模态任务中,老年组在下额和中部额叶区域,扣带回,顶叶下叶以及左锁骨中显示出比年轻组更强的注意力分散性。在老年组中,当执行两个模内任务时,右下顶小叶也被更强地激活,这表明在老年人中,无论感觉方式如何,这种特定的大脑结构都高度参与分散的注意力。我们假设,在旧组中描述的其他激活反映了由于对注意力资源的需求增加而产生的补偿效应,以便调节系统。另一方面,年轻的小组在跨模态任务中仅表现出丘脑的额外激活。这可能表示对注意力分散的任务进行了更加自下而上的组织处理。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vohn René;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号