首页> 外文OA文献 >The Structure and Function of the Idea of “God” in Idealist Logic
【2h】

The Structure and Function of the Idea of “God” in Idealist Logic

机译:唯心主义逻辑中“上帝”观念的结构和功能

摘要

This thesis is a study of the role of the idea of “God” in the systematic metaphysics of rationality found in Kant’s and Hegel’s work. It surveys some basic structural components of their views of theoretical and practical reason and argues for the centrality of certain theological commitments to their broader metaphysical positions. The connection between these theological commitments and a broader metaphysical program is instituted in theories of conceptual determination constitutive of both transcendental idealism and absolute idealism. The connection is found in Kant’s view of the limits of human knowledge and action; these are seen as problematic given the way such limits are supposedly at once both a priori restrictions and yet also incomprehensible. The obscurity of this view has made it a well-known target of attack from Hegelian quarters, and the thesis proceeds by defending certain components of this Kantian view, while making concessions to the Hegelian view that Kant’s retention of such a problematic perspective on unconditioned knowledge and moral perfection was a mistake. udThe first part of the work takes account of some general prejudices found in discourse about both philosophical theology and philosophical anthropology, and makes some remarks about the kind of metaphysical dogmatisms which should be discarded in these arenas. Part two involves an examination of certain metarepresentational structures in Kant’s philosophy and seeks to undermine some of them by appeals to Hegelian theses about rational, conceptual determination. This discussion is connected with Hegel’s reflections on religion. In the third part Kant’s principle of complete determination is examined; its connection with his theology and theory of judgment is discussed, and a Hegelian response to it is recommended. The overall conclusion is that Hegel’s theological views are connected with a more plausible thesis of the nature of normative constraint.
机译:本文是对“上帝”概念在康德和黑格尔著作的系统理性的形而上学中的作用的研究。它调查了他们理论和实践理性观点的一些基本结构成分,并论证了某些神学承诺对他们更广泛的形而上学立场的重要性。这些神学承诺与更广泛的形而上学计划之间的联系是在先验唯心主义和绝对唯心主义的概念确定理论中建立的。在康德关于人类知识和行动的局限性的观点中可以找到这种联系;考虑到这些限制被认为既是先验限制又是难以理解的方式,这些被认为是有问题的。这种观点的模糊性使它成为黑格尔人的住所众所周知的攻击目标,并且论文通过捍卫这种康德主义观点的某些组成部分而继续进行,同时对黑格尔人的观点作出了让步,即康德对无条件知识保留了这种有问题的观点。道德上的完美是一个错误。 ud工作的第一部分考虑了在关于哲学神学和哲学人类学的论述中发现的一些普遍偏见,并对在这些领域应该抛弃的形而上学教条主义作了一些评论。第二部分涉及对康德哲学中某些元表征结构的研究,并通过呼吁黑格尔有关理性,概念确定的论文来破坏其中的一些。这场讨论与黑格尔对宗教的反思有关。在第三部分中,对康德的完全决定性原则进行了考察。讨论了它与他的神学和判断论的联系,并建议黑格尔对它的回应。总体结论是,黑格尔的神学观点与规范约束性质的更合理的论点有关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Clugston Byron;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号