首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative assessment of gasification based coal power plants with various CO2 capture technologies producing electricity and hydrogen
【2h】

Comparative assessment of gasification based coal power plants with various CO2 capture technologies producing electricity and hydrogen

机译:基于气化的燃煤电厂的比较评估,该电厂采用了各种二氧化碳捕集技术来发电和产生氢气

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Seven different types of gasification-based coal conversion processes for producing mainly electricity and in some cases hydrogen (H2), with and without carbon dioxide (CO2) capture, were compared on a consistent basis through simulation studies. The flowsheet for each process was developed in a chemical process simulation tool “Aspen Plus”. The pressure swing adsorption (PSA), physical absorption (Selexol), and chemical looping combustion (CLC) technologies were separately analyzed for processes with CO2 capture. The performances of the above three capture technologies were compared with respect to energetic and exergetic efficiencies, and the level of CO2 emission. The effect of air separation unit (ASU) and gas turbine (GT) integration on the power output of all the CO2 capture cases is assessed. Sensitivity analysis was carried out for the CLC process (electricity-only case) to examine the effect of temperature and water-cooling of the air reactor on the overall efficiency of the process. The results show that, when only electricity production in considered, the case using CLC technology has an electrical efficiency 1.3% and 2.3% higher than the PSA and Selexol based cases, respectively. The CLC based process achieves an overall CO2 capture efficiency of 99.9% in contrast to 89.9% for PSA and 93.5% for Selexol based processes. The overall efficiency of the CLC case for combined electricity and H2 production is marginally higher (by 0.3%) than Selexol and lower (by 0.6%) than PSA cases. The integration between the ASU and GT units benefits all three technologies in terms of electrical efficiency. Furthermore, our results suggest that it is favorable to operate the air reactor of the CLC process at higher temperatures with excess air supply in order to achieve higher power efficiency.
机译:通过模拟研究,在一致的基础上比较了七种不同类型的基于气化的煤炭转化过程,这些过程主要产生电力,有时还捕获和捕获二氧化碳(CO2)和氢气(H2)。在化学过程模拟工具“ Aspen Plus”中开发了每个过程的流程图。分别分析了变压吸附(PSA),物理吸收(Selexol)和化学循环燃烧(CLC)技术中CO2捕集的过程。对以上三种捕集技术的性能进行了比较,包括能量和能量效率以及CO2排放水平。评估了空气分离装置(ASU)和燃气轮机(GT)集成对所有CO2捕集箱功率输出的影响。对CLC过程(仅电情况)进行了敏感性分析,以检查空气反应器的温度和水冷对过程总体效率的影响。结果表明,仅考虑发电时,使用CLC技术的案例的电效率分别比基于PSA和Selexol的案例高1.3%和2.3%。与基于PSA的89.9%和基于Selexol的工艺的93.5%相比,基于CLC的工艺实现了99.9%的总体CO2捕集效率。 CLC案例在电力和氢气生产方面的总体效率比Selexol略高(0.3%),而比PSA案例低(0.6%)。在电效率方面,ASU和GT单元之间的集成使所有这三种技术都受益。此外,我们的结果表明,为了获得更高的功率效率,有利的是在较高的温度下以过量的空气供应来运行CLC工艺的空气反应器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号