首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of nitrification inhibitors to restrict nitrate leaching in a maize crop irrigated under mediterranean conditions
【2h】

Comparison of nitrification inhibitors to restrict nitrate leaching in a maize crop irrigated under mediterranean conditions

机译:硝化抑制剂限制地中海灌溉条件下玉米作物硝酸盐淋失的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this paper was to compare dicyandiamide (DCD) and 3,4 dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) as inhibitors of ammonium oxidation and nitrate leaching after applying fertilizer to a maize (Zea mays L.) crop grown under Mediterranean conditions. The effects of nitrification inhibitors were also compared to those of N fertilization without inhibitors and with split N application. In plots fertilized with ammonium sulphate nitrate (ASN), either DCD or DMPP lengthened ammonium presence in soil and produced lower soil NO3- concentrations (30% lower than in plots with no inhibitor). The use of DCD or DMPP achieved significant reductions in nitrate leaching. DCD showed excellent properties for controlling nitrate leaching, taking into account the fact that grain yield and N accumulated by plant were similar for the ASN-DCD and ASN treatments applied at the same N doses. The split N treatment did not offer any advantages in terms of leached nitrate, either with the use of single ammonium sulphate nitrate (ASN) or with single application of nitrification inhibitors. The nitrification inhibitors did not increase the yield but did not reduce it either. The drainage rate was the most important component of nitrate leaching. The low drainage values of the first year resulted in a sharp decline of nitrate leaching. However, the experiment of the second year, showed clear differences in nitrate leaching between treatments due to the greater drainage.
机译:本文的目的是比较在地中海条件下种植的玉米(Zea mays L.)作物上施肥后,双氰胺(DCD)和3,4-磷酸二甲基吡唑(DMPP)作为铵盐氧化和硝酸盐浸出抑制剂。还比较了硝化抑制剂的效果与不施用抑制剂和分开施用氮素的氮肥的影响。在用硫酸铵硝酸盐(ASN)施肥的地块中,DCD或DMPP延长了土壤中铵的存在,并降低了土壤NO3的浓度(比无抑制剂的地块低30%)。 DCD或DMPP的使用大大减少了硝酸盐的浸出。考虑到在相同的N剂量下,ASN-DCD和ASN处理的谷物产量和植物积累的氮相似,因此DCD具有控制硝酸盐浸出的优异性能。在单独的硝态硫酸铵(ASN)或单独使用硝化抑制剂的情况下,N分离处理在浸出硝酸盐方面没有任何优势。硝化抑制剂不会增加产量,但也不会降低产量。排水速率是硝酸盐浸出的最重要组成部分。第一年的低排水值导致硝酸盐浸出量急剧下降。然而,第二年的实验表明,由于排水量增加,各处理之间硝酸盐浸出存在明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号