首页> 外文OA文献 >Labours old and new : ideological, political and organisational fragmentation on the parliamentary right of the British Labour Party, 1970-79.
【2h】

Labours old and new : ideological, political and organisational fragmentation on the parliamentary right of the British Labour Party, 1970-79.

机译:新旧劳动:1970-79年英国工党议会权利的意识形态,政治和组织分裂。

摘要

This thesis explores the complexity, divisions and eventual fragmentation of theudparliamentary right of the British Labour Party in the late 1960s and 1 970s, and itsudimplications for Labour's intra-party politics. It argues that the Labour right in thisudperiod, in contrast to the Labour left, has been comparatively under-researched. Itudfurther stresses that the detail of inherent complexity and divisions on theudparliamentary Labour right was previously concealed within broad agreement aroundudan adhesive framework of Keynesian social democracy and the basic principles ofud'1950s revisionism'. As the core pillars of this adhesive ideological and politicaludframework collapsed in the particular economic and political context of the late 1960sudand 1970s, the complexity and divisions of the parliamentary Labour right were madeudexplicit. Attempts at intra-party organisation on the parliamentary Labour right in theud1970s further reveal its ideological and political fragmentation. The nature anduddevelopment of this endeavour served only to emphasise the depth of ideological,udpolicy and political divisions on the Labour right, to marginalise an influentialudsegment of Labour right thought and practice, and to indicate the possibility of aud(future) split with the Labour Party. The study adopts case studies of four criticaludpolicy themes to demonstrate the emergence of these divisions from the late 1960sudonwards: European membership, industrial relations and trade union reform, issues ofudpublic expenditure and attitudes to race and immigration policy. The study concludesudthat ideological and political divisions and fragmentation severely undermined theudcohesion and unity of the parliamentary Labour right. In the circumstances, theudLabour right was unable to mount a credible coherent intellectual or institutionaludchallenge to the Labour left, and the seeds of secessionist activity on the Labour rightudwere sown long before Labour's introspective 1979-81 period. Given recent debatesudconcerning the nature and relative novelty or otherwise of New Labour, a postscriptudargues that one important consequence of the failure to reconcile the complexity andudfragmentation of the 'old' Labour right has been an inability to conceive of significantudparallels and continuities between elements of this coalition and New Labour.
机译:本文探讨了英国工党在1960年代末和1 970年代末的 u ^议会权的复杂性,分歧和最终的碎片化及其对工党内部政党政治的双重影响。它认为,相对于左翼劳工,在这个 Uperiod中的右翼劳工权利研究相对较少。它进一步强调,“议会劳动权”固有的复杂性和分歧的细节先前被隐藏在围绕凯恩斯主义社会民主主义的“ udan粘性框架”和“ ud'1950年代修正主义”的基本原则的广泛共识中。在1960年代末至1970年代末特定的经济和政治背景下,这种粘着的思想政治/政治框架的核心支柱瓦解时,议会劳动权的复杂性和分歧变得十分明显。政党内部组织在19世纪20年代对议会劳工权利的尝试进一步揭示了其意识形态和政治分裂。这项工作的性质和发展只是强调了关于劳工权利的意识形态,政治政策和政治分歧的深度,使具有影响力的劳工权利思想和实践边缘化,并指出了实行民主的可能性。未来)与工党分裂。该研究采用了四个关键政治政策主题的案例研究,以证明这些分裂从1960年代末 udon出现了:欧洲会员制,产业关系和工会改革, udpublic支出问题以及对种族和移民政策的态度。研究得出的结论是,意识形态和政治上的分歧和分裂严重损害了议会劳动权利的凝聚力和统一性。在这种情况下,工党右派无法对工党左派发起可靠的,连贯的知识分子或制度上的挑战,而且在工党1979年至81年的内省时期之前播种了分裂主义活动的种子。鉴于最近关于新劳工的性质和相对新颖性的争论,后记争论认为,未能调和“旧”劳动权的复杂性和碎片化的一个重要后果是无法设想重要的“劳动”。这个联盟和新工党之间的矛盾和连续性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Meredith Stephen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号