首页> 外文OA文献 >Coordination of supply chains by option contracts : a cooperative game theory approach
【2h】

Coordination of supply chains by option contracts : a cooperative game theory approach

机译:期权合同协调供应链:一种合作博弈论方法。

摘要

Manufacturer-retailer supply chains commonly adopt a wholesale price mechanism. This mechanism, however, has often led manufacturers and retailers to situations of conflicts of interest. For example, due to uncertain market demand, retailers prefer to order flexibly from manufacturers so as to avoid incurring inventory costs and to be able to respond flexibly to market changes. Manufacturers, on the other hand, prefer retailers to place full orders as early as possible so that they can hedge against the risks of over- and under-production. Such conflicts between retailers and manufacturers can result in an inefficient supply chain. Motivated by this problem, we take a cooperative game approach in this paper to consider the coordination issue in a manufacturer-retailer supply chain using option contracts. Using the wholesale price mechanism as a benchmark, we develop an option contract model. Our study demonstrates that, compared with the benchmark based on the wholesale price mechanism, option contracts can coordinate the supply chain and achieve Pareto-improvement. We also discuss scenarios in which option contracts are selected according to individual supply chain members' risk preferences and negotiating powers.
机译:制造商-零售商供应链通常采用批发价格机制。但是,这种机制通常导致制造商和零售商陷入利益冲突的情况。例如,由于不确定的市场需求,零售商倾向于灵活地向制造商订购,以避免产生库存成本并能够灵活地应对市场变化。另一方面,制造商更喜欢零售商尽早下达全额订单,以便对冲生产过剩和生产不足的风险。零售商和制造商之间的这种冲突可能导致供应链效率低下。出于这个问题的动机,我们在本文中采取了一种合作博弈的方法来考虑使用期权合同的制造商-零售商供应链中的协调问题。以批发价机制为基准,我们开发了期权合约模型。我们的研究表明,与基于批发价格机制的基准相比,期权合约可以协调供应链并实现帕累托改进。我们还讨论了根据个别供应链成员的风险偏好和谈判权力选择期权合同的方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号