首页> 外文OA文献 >Data linkage errors in hospital administrative data when applying a pseudonymisation algorithm to paediatric intensive care records
【2h】

Data linkage errors in hospital administrative data when applying a pseudonymisation algorithm to paediatric intensive care records

机译:将假名化算法应用于儿科重症监护记录时,医院管理数据中的数据链接错误

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: Our aim was to estimate the rate of data linkage error in Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) by testing the HESID pseudoanonymisation algorithm against a reference standard, in a national registry of paediatric intensive care records. Setting: The Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) database, covering 33 paediatric intensive care units in England, Scotland and Wales. Participants: Data from infants and young people aged 0–19 years admitted between 1 January 2004 and 21 February 2014. Primary and secondary outcome measures: PICANet admission records were classified as matches (records belonging to the same patient who had been readmitted) or non-matches (records belonging to different patients) after applying the HESID algorithm to PICANet records. False-match and missed-match rates were calculated by comparing results of the HESID algorithm with the reference standard PICANet ID. The effect of linkage errors on readmission rate was evaluated. Results: Of 166 406 admissions, 88 596 were true matches (where the same patient had been readmitted). The HESID pseudonymisation algorithm produced few false matches (n=176/77 810; 0.2%) but a larger proportion of missed matches (n=3609/88 596; 4.1%). The true readmission rate was underestimated by 3.8% due to linkage errors. Patients who were younger, male, from Asian/Black/Other ethnic groups (vs White) were more likely to experience a false match. Missed matches were more common for younger patients, for Asian/Black/Other ethnic groups (vs White) and for patients whose records had missing data. Conclusions: The deterministic algorithm used to link all episodes of hospital care for the same patient in England has a high missed match rate which underestimates the true readmission rate and will produce biased analyses. To reduce linkage error, pseudoanonymisation algorithms need to be validated against good quality reference standards. Pseudonymisation of data ‘at source’ does not itself address errors in patient identifiers and the impact these errors have on data linkage.
机译:目的:我们的目的是通过在国家小儿重症监护记录中对照参考标准测试HESID伪匿名算法,来估计医院情节统计(HES)中数据链接错误的发生率。设置:儿科重症监护审核网络(PICANet)数据库,涵盖英格兰,苏格兰和威尔士的33个儿科重症监护病房。参加者:2004年1月1日至2014年2月21日之间收治的0-19岁婴幼儿数据。主要和次要指标:PICANet收录记录归类为匹配项(属于已再次入院的同一患者的记录) -将HESID算法应用于PICANet记录后,进行匹配(属于不同患者的记录)。通过将HESID算法的结果与参考标准PICANet ID进行比较,可以计算出错误匹配率和未匹配率。评估了连锁错误对再入院率的影响。结果:在166 406名患者中,有88 596名是真正的匹配者(同一患者已被重新接纳)。 HESID假名化算法产生的错误匹配很少(n = 176/77 810; 0.2%),但是丢失匹配的比例更大(n = 3609/88 596; 4.1%)。由于链接错误,真实的重新录取率被低估了3.8%。来自亚洲/黑人/其他种族(与白人)较年轻的男性患者更容易出现假匹配。错过比赛在年轻患者,亚洲/黑人/其他种族群体(与白人)以及记录中缺少数据的患者中更为常见。结论:用于链接英格兰同一位患者的所有医院护理事件的确定性算法具有很高的漏选率,这低估了真实的再入院率,并且会产生偏倚的分析。为了减少链接错误,需要根据高质量的参考标准对伪匿名算法进行验证。 “从源头”获取数据的假名本身并不能解决患者标识符中的错误以及这些错误对数据链接的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号