首页> 外文OA文献 >There Are Many Purposes for Conditional Incentives to Accessing Healthcare; Comment on “Denial of Treatment to Obese Patients—the Wrong Policy on Personal Responsibility for Health”
【2h】

There Are Many Purposes for Conditional Incentives to Accessing Healthcare; Comment on “Denial of Treatment to Obese Patients—the Wrong Policy on Personal Responsibility for Health”

机译:有条件的激励措施有很多目的来获得医疗保健。评论“拒绝对肥胖患者的治疗-错误的个人健康政策”

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This commentary is a brief response to Nir Eyal’s argument that health policies should not make healthy behaviour a condition or prerequisite in order to access healthcare as it could result in the people who need healthcare the most not being able to access healthcare. While in general agreement due to the shared concern for equity, I argue that making health behaviour a condition to accessing healthcare can serve to develop commitment to lifestyle changes, make the health intervention more successful, help appreciate the value of the resources being spent, and help reflect on the possible risks of the intervention. I also argue that exporting or importing the carrot and stick policies to other countries without a solid understanding of the fiscal and political context of the rise of such policies in the US can lead to perverse consequences.
机译:这篇评论是对尼尔·艾亚(Nir Eyal)的论点的简短回应,他的论点是健康政策不应使健康行为成为获得医疗保健的条件或先决条件,因为这可能导致最需要医疗保健的人们无法获得医疗保健。尽管出于对公平的共同关注而达成共识,但我认为使健康行为成为获得医疗保健的条件可以有助于发展对改变生活方式的承诺,使健康干预更加成功,有助于欣赏所花费资源的价值,以及帮助反思干预的潜在风险。我还争辩说,在没有对美国此类政策兴起的财政和政治背景有深入了解的情况下,向其他国家/地区出口或进口胡萝卜和黏附政策会导致不良后果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Venkatapuram Sridhar;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号