首页> 外文OA文献 >TINJAUAN TENTANG PEMBUKTIAN DAKWAAN PENUNTUT UMUM DENGAN ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI VERBALISAN DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP PUTUSAN DALAM PERKARA PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bulukumba Nomor: 101/Pid.B/2014/PN.BLK)ud
【2h】

TINJAUAN TENTANG PEMBUKTIAN DAKWAAN PENUNTUT UMUM DENGAN ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI VERBALISAN DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP PUTUSAN DALAM PERKARA PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bulukumba Nomor: 101/Pid.B/2014/PN.BLK)ud

机译:审查具有一般证人证词的一般检察官的规定及其对儿童保护的决定的含义(Bulukumba地区法院案例研究:101 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN.BLK)

摘要

ABSTRACT AULIA MUHAMMAD FAHRIZA. E0011046, 2015, AN OVERVIEW OF THE INDICTMENT OF THE PROSECUTOR WITH VERBAL WITNESSES AS EVIDENCES AND IMPLICATIONS THAT ARE APPLIED WITH THE VERDICT IN THE CASE OF CHILDREN PROTECTION. (Case study District Court’s Verdict of Bulukumba Number: 101/Pid.B/2015/PN.BLK), Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta. This research aims to comprehend the conformity with verbal witnesses in the case of children protection with Criminal Code Law (KUHAP), and to understand a consideration from the judge in reviewing and terminating children protection’s case from the verdict of children protection’s case in Bulukumba’s District Court number : 101/Pid.B/2014/PN.BLK. This study is included in the kind of normative law’s research that produces prescriptive about conformity of information from verbal witnesses in matters of children protection. The method in collecting the law datas uses the study of documents from related souces, such as constitution, legal documents, and literatures that deal with the same issue.As for analysis technique, this research is conducted by in a syllogism deductive who is rooted in the submission of the premise major then submitted the premise minor of both the premise then drawn a conclusion. The result of this research is the conformity with verbal witnesses in the case of children protection in Bulukumba’s District Court number : 101/Pid.B/2014/PN.BLK. The judge uses the information from verbal witnesses as the consideration in reviewing and terminating children protection’s case from the verdict of children protection’s case in Bulukumba’s District Court number : 101/Pid.B/2014/PN.BLK. Keywords: Witness, Verbal, Children Protection ud
机译:抽象的AULIA MUHAMMAD FAHRIZA。 E0011046,2015年,对以言语证人作为证据的检举人的概述,适用于在保护儿童的情况下使用VerdICT的证据和含义。 (案例研究地区法院对Bulukumba的裁定:101 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN.BLK),苏拉卡尔塔大学Sebelas Maret大学法学院。这项研究的目的是理解刑法对儿童保护案件中口头证人的遵守,并从布卢昆巴地方法院对儿童保护案件的判决中了解法官在审查和终止儿童保护案件方面的考虑。编号:101 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN.BLK。这项研究包括在规范性法律的研究中,该研究对口头证人在保护儿童方面的信息的一致性做出了规定。收集法律数据的方法是研究相关来源的文件,例如宪法,法律文件和处理同一问题的文献。至于分析技术,该研究是由植根于三段论的演绎者进行的。然后提交前提专业,然后提交两个前提的前提未成年人,然后得出结论。这项研究的结果是,在Bulukumba地区法院对儿童保护的案件中,口头证人的行为符合:101 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN.BLK。法官以口头证人的信息为依据,根据Bulukumba地区法院对儿童保护案的判决,复审和终止儿童保护案:101 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN.BLK。关键字:证人,言语,儿童保护 ud

著录项

  • 作者

    FAHRIZAL AULIA MUHAMMAD;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号