首页> 外文OA文献 >U.S. Corporate and Bank Insolvency Regimes: A Comparison and Evaluation
【2h】

U.S. Corporate and Bank Insolvency Regimes: A Comparison and Evaluation

机译:美国公司和银行破产制度:比较和评估

摘要

In the U.S., the insolvency resolution of most corporations is governed by the federal bankruptcy code and is administered by special bankruptcy courts. Most large corporate bankruptcies are resolved under Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings. However, commercial bank insolvencies are governed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and are administered by the FDIC. These two resolution processes—corporate bankruptcy and bank receiverships—differ in a number of significant ways, including the type of proceeding (judicial versus administrative); the rights of managers, stockholders and creditors in the proceedings; the explicit and implicit goals of the resolution; the prioritization of creditors’ claims; the costs of administration; and the timeliness of creditor payments. These differences derive from perceptions that “banks are special.” This paper elucidates these differences, explores the effectiveness of the procedural differences in achieving the stated goals, and considers consequences of the different structures.
机译:在美国,大多数公司的破产解决方案受联邦破产法的约束,并由专门的破产法院管理。大多数大型公司破产都根据第11章的重组程序解决。但是,商业银行的无力偿债行为受《联邦存款保险法》管辖,并由联邦存款保险公司管理。公司破产和银行破产这两个解决程序在许多重要方面有所不同,包括诉讼程序的类型(司法与行政)。经理,股东和债权人在诉讼中的权利;决议的明确和隐含目标;优先考虑债权人的债权;行政费用;以及债权人付款的及时性。这些差异源于人们对“银行是特殊的”的看法。本文阐明了这些差异,探讨了程序差异在实现既定目标方面的有效性,并考虑了不同结构的后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号