首页> 外文OA文献 >Case-Control Study of the Association Between Kava Use and Ischaemic Heart Disease in Aboriginal Communities in Eastern Arnhem Land (Northern Territory) Australia
【2h】

Case-Control Study of the Association Between Kava Use and Ischaemic Heart Disease in Aboriginal Communities in Eastern Arnhem Land (Northern Territory) Australia

机译:澳大利亚阿纳姆东部地区(北领地)原住民社区卡瓦使用与缺血性心脏病之间关联的病例对照研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In a case-control study, cases comprised 83 people admitted to hospital for the first time during 1992-1997 from the region with a medical officeru27s confirmed diagnosis of IHD (ICD9 Codes 4100-4149). Of these, 25 were admitted on more than one occasion. Up to four randomly selected controls (n=302) were matched with each case for age, sex, and home locality. NT registries indicated that a further 20 people with no record of hospital admission died with IHD during 1992-1997. These were matched with 75 controls.Comprehensive data were not available to identify IHD morbidity before 1992.Methods to measure exposure to kava use, alcohol, tobacco, petrol sniffing, cannabis use, and other possible confounding factors, data analysis techniques, and ethics approvals have been described elsewhere. RESULTS Adjusting for confounders, odds ratios (OR) for kava use before or during 1992-97 changed from 1.41 (95% CI 0.73 to 2.73, p=0.303) to 1.51 (0.75 to 3.05, p=0.247) (table 1). There was no residual confounding effect of age in the multivariate model (OR=1.50, 0.74 to 3.04), (x2=0.23, likelihood ratio test, p=0.635). There was no association with kava use in just those communities where kava had been used for up to 15 years (adjusted OR=1.75, 0.82 to 3.74, p=0.140) or when those admitted on more than one occasion (n=25) were compared with their matched controls (n=132) (adjusted OR=2.24, 0.65 to 7.68, p=0.191). Twenty who died from IHD without hospital admission and 75 matched controls were combined with 83 known admissions and 302 matched controls. No association with kava use was found (adjusted OR=1.44, 0.78 to 2.66, p=0.245) so the results of the analysis of IHD admissions alone were probably not influenced by survival bias.While the expected association between IHD and tobacco use was not found in the univariate analysis (table 1), it appeared when 36 cases were compared with 158 controls who had no record of kava, alcohol, cannabis, or petrol use (OR=3.96, 1.08 to 14.49, p=0.021).
机译:在一项病例对照研究中,病例包括1992年至1997年期间该地区首次入院的83人,其中医务人员确诊IHD(ICD9代码4100-4149)。其中,有25次以上被录取。每个病例的年龄,性别和家庭所在地均与多达四个随机选择的对照(n = 302)匹配。 NT注册机构指出,在1992年至1997年期间,又有20例没有住院记录的人死于IHD。这些患者与75名对照者匹配.1992年之前尚无全面的数据来确定IHD的发病率。测量卡瓦使用,酒精,烟草,汽油嗅探,大麻使用以及其他可能的混杂因素暴露的方法,数据分析技术和伦理学认可已经在其他地方进行了描述。结果调整混杂因素后,1992-97年前或期间卡瓦使用的优势比(OR)从1.41(95%CI 0.73到2.73,p = 0.303)变为1.51(0.75到3.05,p = 0.247)(表1)。在多元模型中(OR = 1.50,0.74至3.04),年龄没有残留的混杂效应(x2 = 0.23,似然比检验,p = 0.635)。仅在使用卡瓦长达15年的社区(调整后的OR = 1.75,0.82至3.74,p = 0.140)或多次接受卡瓦(n = 25)的社区中,与卡瓦使用无关。与其匹配的对照组(n = 132)进行比较(调整后的OR = 2.24,0.65至7.68,p = 0.191)。二十名因IHD死亡而未住院的患者和75名匹配的对照者与83名已知的患者和302名匹配的对照者合并。未发现与卡瓦使用有关(调整后OR = 1.44,0.78至2.66,p = 0.245),因此仅IHD入院分析结果可能不受生存偏差的影响,而IHD与烟草使用之间的预期关联则不受此影响。在单变量分析中发现(表1),当将36例病例与158名没有卡瓦,酒精,大麻或汽油使用记录的对照进行比较时出现(OR = 3.96,1.08至14.49,p = 0.021)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号