首页> 外文OA文献 >How much flower-rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge
【2h】

How much flower-rich habitat is enough for wild pollinators? Answering a key policy question with incomplete knowledge

机译:多少花草栖息地足以满足野生传粉媒介的需求?用不完整的知识回答关键的政策问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In 2013, an opportunity arose in England to develop an agri-environment package for wild pollinators, as part of the new Countryside Stewardship scheme launched in 2015. It can be understood as a 'policy window', a rare and time-limited opportunity to change policy, supported by a narrative about pollinator decline and widely supported mitigating actions. An agri-environment package is a bundle of management options that together supply sufficient resources to support a target group of species. This paper documents information that was available at the time to develop such a package for wild pollinators. Four questions needed answering: (1) Which pollinator species should be targeted? (2) Which resources limit these species in farmland? (3) Which management options provide these resources? (4) What area of each option is needed to support populations of the target species? Focussing on wild bees, we provide tentative answers that were used to inform development of the package. There is strong evidence that floral resources can limit wild bee populations, and several sources of evidence identify a set of agri-environment options that provide flowers and other resources for pollinators. The final question could only be answered for floral resources, with a wide range of uncertainty. We show that the areas of some floral resource options in the basic Wild Pollinator and Farmland Wildlife Package (2% flower-rich habitat and 1 km flowering hedgerow), are sufficient to supply a set of six common pollinator species with enough pollen to feed their larvae at lowest estimates, using minimum values for estimated parameters where a range was available. We identify key sources of uncertainty, and stress the importance of keeping the Package flexible, so it can be revised as new evidence emerges about how to achieve the policy aim of supporting pollinators on farmland.
机译:2013年,英格兰出现了一个为野生传粉媒介开发农业环境一揽子计划的机会,这是2015年启动的新“乡村管理计划”的一部分。这可以理解为“政策窗口”,这是一个难得的,有时间限制的机会更改政策,并辅以有关传粉媒介衰落的叙述和广泛支持的缓解措施。农业环境一揽子计划是一整套管理选择,它们共同提供足够的资源来支持目标物种。本文记录了当时为野生传粉媒介开发此类软件包的可用信息。需要回答四个问题:(1)应该针对哪些传粉媒介物种? (2)哪些资源限制了农田中的这些物种? (3)哪些管理选项可提供这些资源? (4)每个方案需要哪些区域来支持目标物种的种群?我们以野生蜜蜂为重点,提供了一些初步的答案,这些信息被用来告知包装的发展。有强有力的证据表明花卉资源可以限制野生蜂的数量,并且有多种证据表明可以为授粉媒介提供花卉和其他资源的一系列农业环境选择。最后一个问题只能针对花卉资源回答,不确定性很大。我们显示,基本的“野生传粉媒介和农田野生动物包装”中一些花卉资源选择的区域(2%的花朵丰富的栖息地和1公里的开花树篱)足以提供一组六种常见的传粉媒介物种,其花粉足以喂养它们最低估计值的幼虫,在可获得范围的情况下使用估计参数的最小值。我们确定不确定性的主要根源,并强调保持一揽子计划灵活的重要性,因此可以在有关如何实现支持农田传粉媒介的政策目标的新证据出现时对其进行修订。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号