首页> 外文OA文献 >A GCSS model intercomparison for a tropical squall line observed during toga-coare. II: Intercomparison of single-column models and a cloud-resolving model
【2h】

A GCSS model intercomparison for a tropical squall line observed during toga-coare. II: Intercomparison of single-column models and a cloud-resolving model

机译:GGACSS模型比对在一次toga-coare期间观察到的热带线。 II:单列模型和云解析模型的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper presents single-column model (SCM) simulations of a tropical squall-line case observed during the Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Response Experiment of the Tropical Ocean/Global Atmosphere Programme. This case-study was part of an international model intercomparison project organized by Working Group 4 ‘Precipitating Convective Cloud Systems’ of the GEWEX (Global Energy and Water-cycle Experiment) Cloud System Study.ududEight SCM groups using different deep-convection parametrizations participated in this project. The SCMs were forced by temperature and moisture tendencies that had been computed from a reference cloud-resolving model (CRM) simulation using open boundary conditions. The comparison of the SCM results with the reference CRM simulation provided insight into the ability of current convection and cloud schemes to represent organized convection. The CRM results enabled a detailed evaluation of the SCMs in terms of the thermodynamic structure and the convective mass flux of the system, the latter being closely related to the surface convective precipitation. It is shown that the SCMs could reproduce reasonably well the time evolution of the surface convective and stratiform precipitation, the convective mass flux, and the thermodynamic structure of the squall-line system. The thermodynamic structure simulated by the SCMs depended on how the models partitioned the precipitation between convective and stratiform. However, structural differences persisted in the thermodynamic profiles simulated by the SCMs and the CRM. These differences could be attributed to the fact that the total mass flux used to compute the SCM forcing differed from the convective mass flux. The SCMs could not adequately represent these organized mesoscale circulations and the microphysicallradiative forcing associated with the stratiform region. This issue is generally known as the ‘scale-interaction’ problem that can only be properly addressed in fully three-dimensional simulations.ududSensitivity simulations run by several groups showed that the time evolution of the surface convective precipitation was considerably smoothed when the convective closure was based on convective available potential energy instead of moisture convergence. Finally, additional SCM simulations without using a convection parametrization indicated that the impact of a convection parametrization in forced SCM runs was more visible in the moisture profiles than in the temperature profiles because convective transport was particularly important in the moisture budget.
机译:本文介绍了在热带海洋/全球大气计划的耦​​合海洋-大气响应实验中观察到的热带线案例的单列模型(SCM)模拟。此案例研究是GEWEX(全球能源和水循环实验)云系统研究的第4工作组“沉淀对流云系统”组织的国际模型比较项目的一部分。 ud ud八个SCM组使用不同的深度对流参数化参与了这个项目。 SCM受温度和湿度趋势的强迫,这些趋势是使用开放边界条件从参考云解析模型(CRM)模拟计算得出的。 SCM结果与参考CRM仿真的比较提供了对当前对流和云方案表示有组织对流的能力的深入了解。 CRM结果可以根据系统的热力学结构和对流质量通量对SCM进行详细评估,后者与表面对流降水密切相关。结果表明,SCMs可以合理地再现地表对流和层状降水的时间演化,对流质量通量以及线系统的热力学结构。 SCM模拟的热力学结构取决于模型如何在对流和层状之间分配降水。但是,结构差异仍然存在于由SCM和CRM模拟的热力学曲线中。这些差异可归因于以下事实:用于计算SCM强迫的总质量通量与对流质量通量不同。 SCM不能充分代表这些有组织的中尺度环流和与层状区域相关的微物理辐射强迫。这个问题通常被称为“水垢-相互作用”问题,只有在完整的三维模拟中才能正确解决。 ud ud由多个小组进行的敏感性模拟显示,当对流降水的时间演化大大平滑时,对流封闭是基于对流可用势能而不是水分收敛。最后,没有使用对流参数化的其他SCM模拟表明,强迫SCM运行中对流参数化的影响在湿度曲线中比在温度曲线中更明显,因为对流传输在水分预算中尤为重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号