首页> 外文OA文献 >Trends and predictors of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and clusters with TDR in a local Belgian HIV-1 epidemic
【2h】

Trends and predictors of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and clusters with TDR in a local Belgian HIV-1 epidemic

机译:比利时当地HIV-1流行病中的耐药性(TDR)和TDR簇的趋势和预测指标

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We aimed to study epidemic trends and predictors for transmitted drug resistance (TDR) in our region, its clinical impact and its association with transmission clusters. We included 778 patients from the AIDS Reference Center in Leuven (Belgium) diagnosed from 1998 to 2012. Resistance testing was performed using population-based sequencing and TDR was estimated using the WHO-2009 surveillance list. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using maximum likelihood and Bayesian techniques. The cohort was predominantly Belgian (58.4%), men who have sex with men (MSM) (42.8%), and chronically infected (86.5%). The overall TDR prevalence was 9.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.7-11.9), 6.5% (CI: 5.0-8.5) for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), 2.2% (CI: 1.4-3.5) for non-NRTI (NNRTI), and 2.2% (CI: 1.4-3.5) for protease inhibitors. A significant parabolic trend of NNRTI-TDR was found (p = 0.019). Factors significantly associated with TDR in univariate analysis were male gender, Belgian origin, MSM, recent infection, transmission clusters and subtype B, while multivariate and Bayesian network analysis singled out subtype B as the most predictive factor of TDR. Subtype B was related with transmission clusters with TDR that included 42.6% of the TDR patients. Thanks to resistance testing, 83% of the patients with TDR who started therapy had undetectable viral load whereas half of the patients would likely have received a suboptimal therapy without this test. In conclusion, TDR remained stable and a NNRTI up-and-down trend was observed. While the presence of clusters with TDR is worrying, we could not identify an independent, non-sequence based predictor for TDR or transmission clusters with TDR that could help with guidelines or public health measures.
机译:我们旨在研究该地区的流行趋势和传播耐药性(TDR)的预测因素,其临床影响以及与传播群的关系。我们纳入了1998年至2012年从比利时鲁汶(巴西)爱滋病参考中心诊断出来的778名患者。使用基于人群的测序方法进行了耐药性测试,并使用WHO-2009监测名单对TDR进行了估算。系统发育分析是使用最大似然法和贝叶斯技术进行的。该队列主要是比利时人(58.4%),与男性发生性关系的男性(MSM)(42.8%)和慢性感染(86.5%)。总体TDR患病率为6.6%(95%置信区间(CI):7.7-11.9),6.5%(CI:5.0-8.5)对于核苷逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTI),2.2%(CI:1.4-3.5)对于非核苷逆转录酶抑制剂-NRTI(NNRTI)和2.2%(CI:1.4-3.5)用于蛋白酶抑制剂。发现NNRTI-TDR有明显的抛物线趋势(p = 0.019)。在单变量分析中与TDR显着相关的因素是男性,比利时血统,MSM,近期感染,传播簇和B型,而多变量和贝叶斯网络分析则将B型作为TDR的最预测因素。 B亚型与TDR传播群有关,包括42.6%的TDR患者。得益于抗药性测试,开始治疗的83%的TDR患者的病毒载量无法检测到,而如果没有这项测试,一半的患者可能接受了次优治疗。总之,TDR保持稳定,并且观察到NNRTI的上升和下降趋势。尽管存在具有TDR的聚类令人担忧,但我们无法为TDR或具有TDR的传播聚类确定独立的,基于非序列的预测因子,可以帮助制定指南或公共卫生措施。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号