首页> 外文OA文献 >Routine gastric residual volume measurement and energy target achievement in the PICU: A comparison study
【2h】

Routine gastric residual volume measurement and energy target achievement in the PICU: A comparison study

机译:PICU的常规胃残余量测量和能量目标实现:一项比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Critically ill children frequently fail to achieve adequate energy intake and some care practices, such as the measurement of gastric residual volume (GRV) may contribute to this problem. We compared outcomes in two similar European Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs): one which routinely measures GRV (PICU-GRV) to one unit that does not (PICU-noGRV). An observational pilot comparison study was undertaken. 87 children were included in the study, 42 (PICU-GRV) and 45 (PICU-noGRV). There were no significant differences in the percentage of energy targets achieved in the first four days of PICU admission although PICU-noGRV showed more consistent delivery of median (and IQR) energy targets, and less under and over feeding for PICU-GRV and PICU-noGRV Day 1 37 (14-72) vs 44 (0-100); Day 2 97 (53-126) vs 100 (100-100), Day 3 84 (45-112) vs 100 (100-100) , Day 4 101 (63-124) vs 100 (100-100). The incidence of vomiting was higher in PICU-GRV. No necrotising enterocolitis was confirmed in either unit and ventilator acquired pneumonia rates were not significantly different (7.01 vs 12 5.31 per 1000 ventilator days; p=0.70) between PICU-GRV and PICU-noGRV units. Conclusions: The practice of routine gastric residual measurement did not significantly impair energy targets in the first four days of PICU admission. However, not measuring GRV did not increase vomiting, ventilator acquired pneumonia or necrotising enterocolitis, which is the main reason clinicians cite for measuring GRV. udWhat is known?ud•The practice of routinely measuring gastric residual volume is widespread in critical care unitsud•This practice is increasingly being questioned in critically ill patients, both as a practice that increases ud•the likelihood of delivering inadequate enteral nutrition amounts and as a tool to assess feeding tolerance udWhat is new? ud•Not routinely measuring gastric residual volume did not increase adverse events of ventilator acquired pneumonia, necrotising enterocolitis or vomiting ud•In the first four days of PICU stay, energy target achievement was not significantly different, but the rates of under and over feeding were higher in the routine GRV measurement unit
机译:重症儿童经常无法获得足够的能量摄入,某些护理习惯(例如测量胃残余体积(GRV))可能会导致此问题。我们比较了两个类似的欧洲儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的结局:一个常规测量GRV(PICU-GRV),另一个常规不测量(PICU-noGRV)。进行了观察性飞行员比较研究。这项研究包括87名儿童,其中42名(PICU-GRV)和45名(PICU-noGRV)。尽管PICU-noGRV显示中位数(和IQR)能量目标的递送更加一致,而PICU-GRV和PICU-的喂养不足和过量,但在入院前四天实现的能量目标百分比没有显着差异。 noGRV第1天37(14-72)对44(0-100);第2天97(53-126)对100(100-100),第3天84(45-112)对100(100-100),第4 101(63-124)对100(100-100)。 PICU-GRV的呕吐发生率较高。 PICU-GRV和PICU-noGRV单位之间均未确认坏死性小肠结肠炎,呼吸机获得性肺炎的发生率无显着差异(7.0 / vs 12 5.31 / 1000呼吸机天; p = 0.70)。结论:常规胃残余测量的实践并没有显着损害PICU入院的前四天的能量目标。但是,不测量GRV不会增加呕吐,呼吸机获得性肺炎或坏死性小肠结肠炎,这是临床医生引用测量GRV的主要原因。 ud什么是已知的? ud•在重症监护病房中,常规测量胃残余容积的做法很普遍 ud•在重症患者中,这种做法正受到越来越多的质疑,因为这两种做法都会增加 ud•分娩不充分的可能性肠内营养量并作为评估喂养耐受性的工具 ud有什么新内容? ud•不常规测量胃残余容量并没有增加呼吸机获得性肺炎,坏死性小肠结肠炎或呕吐的不良事件。 ud•在PICU停留的前四天,能量目标达成没有显着差异,但低于和超过的比率常规GRV测量单元的进食率较高

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号