首页> 外文OA文献 >Fire Regimes of the Southern Appalachian Mountains: Temporal and Spatial Variability and Implications for Vegetation Dynamics
【2h】

Fire Regimes of the Southern Appalachian Mountains: Temporal and Spatial Variability and Implications for Vegetation Dynamics

机译:南部阿巴拉契亚山脉的火灾情况:时空变异及其对植被动态的影响

摘要

Ecologists continue to debate the role of fire in forests of the southern Appalachian Mountains. How does climate influence fire in these humid, temperate forests? Did fire regimes change during the transition from Native American settlement to Euro-American settlement? Are fire regime changes resulting in broad vegetation changes in the forests of eastern North America? I used several approaches to address these questions. First, I used digitized fire perimeter maps from Great Smoky Mountains National Park and Shenandoah National Park for 1930-2009 to characterize spatial and temporal patterns of wildfire by aspect, elevation, and landform. Results demonstrate that fuel moisture is a primary control, with fire occurring most frequently during dry years, in dry regions, and at dry topographic positions. Climate also modifies topographic control, with weaker topographic patterns under drier conditions. Second, I used dendroecological methods to reconstruct historical fire frequency in yellow pine (Pinus, subgenus Diploxylon Koehne) stands at three field sites in the southern Appalachian Mountains. The fire history reconstructions extend from 1700 to 2009, with composite fire return intervals ranging from 2-4 years prior to the fire protection period. The two longest reconstructions record frequent fire during periods of Native American land use. Except for the recent fire protection period, temporal changes in land use did not have a significant impact on fire frequency and there was little discernible influence of climate on past fire occurrence. Third, I sampled vegetation composition in four different stand types along a topographic moisture gradient, including mesic cove, sub-mesic white pine (Pinus strobus L.) hardwood, sub-xeric oak (Quercus L.), and xeric pine forests in an unlogged watershed with a reconstructed fire history. Stand age structures demonstrate changes in establishment following fire exclusion in xeric pine stands, sub-xeric oak stands, and sub-mesic white pine-hardwood stands. Fire-tolerant yellow pines and oaks are being replaced by shade-tolerant, fire sensitive species such as red maple (Acer rubrum L.) and hemlock (Tsuga canadensis L. Carr.). Classification analysis and ordination of species composition in different age classes suggest a trend of successional convergence in the absence of fire with a shift from four to two forest communities.
机译:生态学家继续争论着火在阿巴拉契亚山脉南部森林中的作用。气候如何影响这些潮湿温带森林的火灾?在从美国原住民定居点到欧美定居点的过渡过程中,火灾状况是否发生了变化?火势变化是否导致北美东部森林的植被发生广泛变化?我使用了几种方法来解决这些问题。首先,我使用了大烟山国家公园和雪兰多厄国家公园1930-2009年的数字化火界图,通过纵横比,海拔和地形来描述野火的时空格局。结果表明,燃油湿度是主要控制措施,在干旱年份,干旱地区和干燥地形位置,火灾最频繁发生。气候也改变了地形控制,在较干燥的条件下,地形格局变弱。其次,我使用树状生态学方法重建了位于阿巴拉契亚山脉南部三个野外地点的黄松(松树,Diploxylon Koehne属)的历史火灾频率。火灾历史的重建时间从1700年延长到2009年,综合防火间隔时间为防火期之前的2-4年。最长的两次重建记录了美国原住民土地使用期间的频繁起火。除了最近的防火期外,土地使用的时间变化对火灾发生的频率没有显着影响,气候对过去火灾的影响几乎没有可察觉的影响。第三,我沿着地形湿度梯度对四种不同林分类型的植被组成进行了采样,包括中型海湾,亚中型白松(Pinus strobus L.)硬木,亚干性橡木(Quercus L.)和松树中的干性松林。重建火灾历史的未记录分水岭。林分年龄结构表明,在干燥的松木林,次干栎木林和次中白松木-硬木林中,火灾后建筑结构发生了变化。耐火的黄色松树和橡树树被耐火,耐火的树种所取代,例如红枫(Acer rubrum L.)和铁杉(Tsuga canadensis L. Carr。)。对不同年龄类别的物种组成进行分类分析和排序表明,在无火的情况下,演替收敛的趋势是从四个森林群落向两个森林群落转变。

著录项

  • 作者

    Flatley William 1977-;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号