首页> 外文OA文献 >The interaction between monetary and macroprudential policy: should central banks ‘lean against the wind’ to foster macro-financial stability?
【2h】

The interaction between monetary and macroprudential policy: should central banks ‘lean against the wind’ to foster macro-financial stability?

机译:货币和宏观审慎政策之间的互动:中央银行应对风力倾向于培养宏观金融稳定性吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The extensive harm caused by the financial crisis raises the question of whether policymakers could have done more to prevent the build-up of financial imbalances. This paper aims to contribute to the field of regulatory impact assessment by taking up the revived debate on whether central banks should "lean against the wind" or not. Currently, there is no consensus on whether monetary policy is, in general, able to support the resilience of the financial system or if this task should better be left to the macroprudential approach of financial regulation. We aim to shed light on this issue by analyzing distinct policy regimes within an agent-based computational macro-model with endogenous money. We find that policies make use of their comparative advantage leading to superior outcomes concerning their respective intended objectives. In particular, we show that "leaning against the wind" should only serve as first line of defense in the absence of a prudential regulatory regime and that price stability does not necessarily mean financial stability. Moreover, macroprudential regulation as unburdened policy instrument is able to dampen the build-up of financial imbalances by restricting credit to the unsustainable high-leveraged part of the real economy. In contrast, leaning against the wind seems to have no positive impact on financial stability which strengthens proponents of Tinbergen's principle arguing that both policies are designed for their specific purpose and that they should be used accordingly.
机译:金融危机造成的广泛损害提出了一个问题,即决策者是否可以采取更多措施来防止金融不平衡的加剧。本文旨在通过就中央银行是否应“逆风而上”展开辩论,为监管影响评估领域做出贡献。当前,关于货币政策总体上是否能够支持金融系统的弹性,或者是否应将这项任务更好地留给金融监管的宏观审慎方法,尚无共识。我们旨在通过分析具有内生资金的基于代理的计算宏模型中的不同政策机制,来阐明这一问题。我们发现政策利用了它们的比较优势,从而在各自的预期目标方面取得了卓越的成果。特别是,我们表明,在缺乏审慎的监管制度的情况下,“逆风而行”仅应作为第一道防线,而价格稳定并不一定意味着金融稳定。此外,宏观审慎监管作为无负担的政策工具,可以通过限制对实体经济中不可持续的高杠杆部分的信贷来减轻金融失衡的积累。相比之下,逆风似乎对金融稳定没有积极影响,这增强了丁伯根原则的支持者,后者认为两种政策都是针对其特定目的而设计的,应该相应地使用它们。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sebastian Krug;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2018
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号