首页> 外文OA文献 >Effectiveness of Posidonia oceanica biotic indices for assessing the ecological status of coastal waters in Saronikos Gulf (Aegean Sea, Eastern Mediterranean)
【2h】

Effectiveness of Posidonia oceanica biotic indices for assessing the ecological status of coastal waters in Saronikos Gulf (Aegean Sea, Eastern Mediterranean)

机译:波萨德尼亚海洋生物指标评估萨龙科斯海湾沿海水域生态地位的有效性(爱琴海,东地中海)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Biotic indices are considered key assessment tools in most national and European policies aimed at improving the quality of coastal waters. At present, several Water Framework Directive (WFD)-compliant biotic indices based on the marine angiosperm Posidonia oceanica have been developed and applied in the Mediterranean Sea. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of four different P. oceanica indices (POMI, PREI, Valencian CS, and BiPo) in evaluating the ecological status of coastal waters in a case study area of Greece. The evaluation, comparison, and validation of the Ecological Status Class (ESC) assessments obtained by each index were based on a set of eight common sites that encompasses the maximum range of environmental quality in the study area. Four sampling sites separated by tens of km were chosen in each of the two water bodies (WBs) studied. The spatial variations of the features of P. oceanica meadows were examined according to a hierarchical sampling design across four spatial scales, ranging from metres to tens of km, using independent nested analysis of variance. Except for the BiPo index, the reference values for each metric/index were defined by the dataset available for the study area. All biotic indices classified the WBs of the study area in Good ESC category. Only three of the four indices (PREI, Valencian CS, and BiPo) showed high comparability in the assessment of ESC at study site level. It is assumed that the differences found in the remaining index (POMI) are due to the different type of metrics taken into consideration and the different weighting given to them. Our findings suggest that all indices can provide an overall view of the cumulative impact of multiple environmental stressors existing in the study area, and can thus help raise awareness of ecosystem degradation.
机译:在大多数国家和欧洲政策中,生物指数被视为关键评估工具,旨在提高沿海水域的质量。目前,几种水框架指令(WFD) - 基于海洋上海植物Posidonia Oceanica的替换生物指数已经开发并应用于地中海。在这项研究中,我们调查了四种不同的P. Oceanica指数(PIMI,Prei,Valencian CS和BIPO)的有效性在希腊案例研究区评估沿海水域的生态地位。每个指数获得的生态现状类(ESC)评估的评估,比较和验证基于一组八个常见网站,包括研究区域中的最大环境质量范围。在研究的每个水体(WBS)中选择了四个km的四个采样点。根据四个空间尺度的分层采样设计检查了P. Oceanica Meadows特征的空间变化,该设计范围从米到几十km,使用独立嵌套的方差分析。除了BIPO索引之外,每个度量标准/索引的参考值都由该研究区域可用的数据集定义。所有生物索引在良好的ESC类别中分类了研究区域的WBS。四个指数中只有三个(Prei,valencian CS和BIPO)在研究现场水平评估中表现出高可比性。假设剩余索引(POMI)中发现的差异是由于考虑的不同类型的度量以及给予的不同权重。我们的研究结果表明,所有指数都可以提供研究区域中存在的多种环境压力源的累积影响的整体观点,从而可以帮助提高对生态系统退化的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号