首页> 外文OA文献 >Mental Illness Stigma. A Comparative Cross-sectional Study of Social Stigma, Internalized Stigma and Self-esteem
【2h】

Mental Illness Stigma. A Comparative Cross-sectional Study of Social Stigma, Internalized Stigma and Self-esteem

机译:精神疾病耻辱。社会耻辱,内化耻辱和自尊的比较横截面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to explore the role of stigma in different diagnoses of mental illness. A cross-sectional study (N = 255) was developed in two groups: users of a rehabilitation network for people with severe mental illness (Group-I) and people with common diagnoses in an ambulatory psychiatric service (Group-II). Internalized stigma, social stigma, self-esteem, and sociodemographic variables were measured. Mean comparisons, ANOVAs, and independent linear regression models were carried out. Similar overall scores were obtained for the internalized stigma, but Group-I reported more discrimination and resistance to stigma and also had less social stigma. The regression model for Group-I revealed social stigma and self-esteem as predictors, while in Group-II only self-esteem was significant. The study reveals differences in internalized stigma according to the care resource and diagnoses, suggesting different intervention lines and underlining the importance of further research on this topic.
机译:本研究的目的是探讨耻辱在不同诊断精神疾病的作用。横截面研究(n = 255)分为两组:康复网络的用户,为严重精神疾病(Ⅰ组)和常见诊断的人士在动态精神病学务(II组)中。测量了内化耻辱,社会耻辱,自尊和社会渗透变量。进行平均比较,ANOVA和独立的线性回归模型。为内化耻辱获得了类似的总重量,但群体 - 我报告了更多的歧视和对耻辱的抵抗,并且也具有较少的社会耻辱。集团的回归模型 - 我透露了社会耻辱和自尊作为预测因子,而在第II组中只有自尊是重要的。该研究揭示了根据护理资源和诊断的内化耻辱的差异,暗示了不同的干预措施,并强调了进一步研究本主题的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号