首页> 外文OA文献 >Use of tracheobronchial tree 3-dimensional printed model: does it improve trainees’ understanding of segmentation anatomy? A prospective study
【2h】

Use of tracheobronchial tree 3-dimensional printed model: does it improve trainees’ understanding of segmentation anatomy? A prospective study

机译:使用气管焦制树三维印刷模型:它是否提高了对细分解剖学的理解?一项潜在的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background This prospective study investigated whether the use of 3D-printed model facilitates novice learning of radiology anatomy on multiplanar computed tomography (CT) when compared to traditional 2D-based learning tools. Specifically, whether the use of a 3D printed model improved interpretation of multiplanar CT tracheobronchial anatomy. Methods Thirty-one medical students (10F, 21 M) from years one to three were recruited, matched for gender and level of training and randomized to 2D or 3D group. Students underwent 20-min self-study session using 2D-printed image or 3D-printed model of the tracheobronchial tree. Immediately after, students answered 10 multiple-choice questions (Test 1) to identify tracheobronchial tree branches on multiplanar CT images. Two weeks later, identical test (Test 2) was used to assess retention of information. Mean scores of 2D and 3D groups were calculated. Student’s t test was used to compare mean differences in tests scores and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the interaction of gender, CT imaging plane and time on test scores between the two groups. Results For test 1, 2D group had higher mean score than 3D group although not statistically significant (7.69 and 7.43, p = 0.39). Mean scores for Test 2 were significantly lower than for Test 1 (7 and 7.57, p = 0.03) with mean score decline for 2D group (Test 1 = 7.69, Test 2 = 6.63, p = 0.03), and similar score for 3D group (Test 1 and 2 = 7.43). There was no statistically significant interaction of gender and test score over time. Significant interaction between group and time of test was found for axial CT images but not for coronal images. Conclusions Use of a 3D-printed model of the tracheobronchial anatomy had no immediate advantage over traditional 2D-printed images for learning CT anatomy. However, use of a 3D model improved students’ ability to retain learned information, irrespective of gender.
机译:摘要背景研究了与传统的2D基于2D的学习工具相比,研究了3D印刷模型的使用是否有助于在多平坦计算机断层扫描(CT)上的放射性解剖学进行促进放射性解剖学。具体地,是否使用3D印刷模型改善了对多平面CT气管支出解剖学的解释。方法招募了三十一名医学生(10F,21米),招募了一至三年,符合性别和培训水平,并随机分为2D或3D组。学生使用了2D印刷图像或气管藻菊树的3D印刷模型进行了20分钟的自学会话。之后,学生立即回答了10个多项选择题(测试1),以识别多平面CT图像上的气管支出树枝。两周后,使用相同的测试(测试2)来评估信息保留。计算2D和3D组的平均分。学生的T试验用于比较测试评分的平均差异和方差分析(ANOVA)用于评估性别,CT成像平面和时间对两组之间的测试分数的相互作用。测试1的结果,2D组的平均得分高于3D组,尽管没有统计学意义(7.69和7.43,P = 0.39)。试验2的平均分数显着低于测试1(7和7.57,P = 0.03),2D组的平均得分下降(测试1 = 7.69,测试2 = 6.63,P = 0.03),以及3D组的类似分数(测试1和2 = 7.43)。随着时间的推移,性别和测试分数没有统计上显着的相互作用。找到组和测试时间之间的显着相互作用,用于轴向CT图像,但不是冠状图像。结论使用三琴拍解剖学的3D印刷模型与传统的2D印刷图像没有直接的优势,用于学习CT解剖学。然而,无论性别如何,使用3D模型都改善了学生保留学习信息的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号