首页> 外文OA文献 >The Nordic Maintenance Care program: Effectiveness of chiropractic maintenance care versus symptom-guided treatment for recurrent and persistent low back pain—A pragmatic randomized controlled trial
【2h】

The Nordic Maintenance Care program: Effectiveness of chiropractic maintenance care versus symptom-guided treatment for recurrent and persistent low back pain—A pragmatic randomized controlled trial

机译:北欧维护保健计划:脊椎按摩疗法的有效性与症状导向治疗反复性和持续性低腰疼痛的治疗 - 一种务实的随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND:For individuals with recurrent or persistent non-specific low back pain (LBP), exercise and exercise combined with education have been shown to be effective in preventing new episodes or in reducing the impact of the condition. Chiropractors have traditionally used Maintenance Care (MC), as secondary and tertiary prevention strategies. The aim of this trial was to investigate the effectiveness of MC on pain trajectories for patients with recurrent or persistent LBP. METHOD:This pragmatic, investigator-blinded, two arm randomized controlled trial included consecutive patients (18-65 years old) with non-specific LBP, who had an early favorable response to chiropractic care. After an initial course of treatment, eligible subjects were randomized to either MC or control (symptom-guided treatment). The primary outcome was total number of days with bothersome LBP during 52 weeks collected weekly with text-messages (SMS) and estimated by a GEE model. RESULTS:Three hundred and twenty-eight subjects were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups. MC resulted in a reduction in the total number of days per week with bothersome LBP compared with symptom-guided treatment. During the 12 month study period, the MC group (n = 163, 3 dropouts) reported 12.8 (95% CI = 10.1, 15.5; p = <0.001) fewer days in total with bothersome LBP compared to the control group (n = 158, 4 dropouts) and received 1.7 (95% CI = 1.8, 2.1; p = <0.001) more treatments. Numbers presented are means. No serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION:MC was more effective than symptom-guided treatment in reducing the total number of days over 52 weeks with bothersome non-specific LBP but it resulted in a higher number of treatments. For selected patients with recurrent or persistent non-specific LBP who respond well to an initial course of chiropractic care, MC should be considered an option for tertiary prevention.
机译:背景:对于具有复发或持续的非特异性低腰痛(LBP)的个体,锻炼和运动结合教育已被证明有效地防止新事件或降低病情的影响。脊椎按摩师传统上使用了维护护理(MC),作为二级和三级预防策略。该试验的目的是探讨MC对复发性或持久性LBP患者疼痛轨迹的有效性。方法:这种务实,调查症盲,两只武器随机对照试验包括连续患者(18-65岁),具有非特异性LBP,他对脊椎按摩术进行了早期良好的反应。在初始治疗过程之后,符合条件的受试者被随机化为MC或控制(症状引导处理)。主要结果是在每周收集的52周内与短信(SMS)收集的52周和由GEE模型估计的初级结果。结果:三百二十八次受试者被随机分配给两个治疗组中的一个。 MC导致与症状引导治疗相比,每周每周总天数减少。在12个月的研究期间,与对照组相比,MC组(n = 163,3滴)报告12.8(95%CI = 10.1,15.5; p = <0.001),与对照组相比,与对照组相比,与对照组相比(n = 158) ,4次丢失)并收到1.7(95%CI = 1.8,2.1; p = <0.001)。呈现的数字是手段。没有记录严重的不良事件。结论:MC比症状导向治疗更有效,以通过麻痹的非特异性LBP减少52周超过52周的总日,但它导致了更高的治疗方法。对于具有良好对脊椎疗程初始过程的反复性或持续的非特异性LBP的选定患者,MC应被视为第三次预防的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号