首页> 外文OA文献 >Methods to adjust for multiple comparisons in the analysis and sample size calculation of randomised controlled trials with multiple primary outcomes
【2h】

Methods to adjust for multiple comparisons in the analysis and sample size calculation of randomised controlled trials with multiple primary outcomes

机译:在分析和样本量计算中调整多重比较的方法,具有多个主要结果的随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Multiple primary outcomes may be specified in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). When analysing multiple outcomes it’s important to control the family wise error rate (FWER). A popular approach to do this is to adjust the p-values corresponding to each statistical test used to investigate the intervention effects by using the Bonferroni correction. It’s also important to consider the power of the trial to detect true intervention effects. In the context of multiple outcomes, depending on the clinical objective, the power can be defined as: ‘disjunctive power’, the probability of detecting at least one true intervention effect across all the outcomes or ‘marginal power’ the probability of finding a true intervention effect on a nominated outcome. We provide practical recommendations on which method may be used to adjust for multiple comparisons in the sample size calculation and the analysis of RCTs with multiple primary outcomes. We also discuss the implications on the sample size for obtaining 90% disjunctive power and 90% marginal power. Methods We use simulation studies to investigate the disjunctive power, marginal power and FWER obtained after applying Bonferroni, Holm, Hochberg, Dubey/Armitage-Parmar and Stepdown-minP adjustment methods. Different simulation scenarios were constructed by varying the number of outcomes, degree of correlation between the outcomes, intervention effect sizes and proportion of missing data. Results The Bonferroni and Holm methods provide the same disjunctive power. The Hochberg and Hommel methods provide power gains for the analysis, albeit small, in comparison to the Bonferroni method. The Stepdown-minP procedure performs well for complete data. However, it removes participants with missing values prior to the analysis resulting in a loss of power when there are missing data. The sample size requirement to achieve the desired disjunctive power may be smaller than that required to achieve the desired marginal power. The choice between whether to specify a disjunctive or marginal power should depend on the clincial objective.
机译:摘要背景可以在随机对照试验(RCT)中规定多个主要结果。在分析多种结果时,控制家庭明智的错误率(FWER)很重要。一种流行的方法来做到这一点是通过使用Bonferroni校正来调整用于调查用于研究干预效果的每个统计测试的p值。考虑试验的权力也很重要,以检测真正的干预效果。在多种结果的背景下,根据临床目的,权力可以定义为:“析出动力”,在所有结果或“边际功率”中检测至少一个真正干预效果的可能性,这些概率是找到真实的概率干预效应提名结果。我们提供了有关哪种方法可以用于调整样本尺寸计算中的多种比较的方法以及具有多个主要结果的RCT分析。我们还讨论了对样品尺寸的影响,以获得90%的分离功率和90%边缘功率。方法采用仿真研究来研究应用Bonferroni,Holm,Hochberg,Dubey / Carmitage-Parmar和Scepth-Minp调整方法后获得的拆除电源,边缘功率和FWER。通过改变结果,结果,干预效果大小与缺失数据比例之间的相关程度来构建不同的仿真方案。结果Bonferroni和Holm方法提供了相同的分解功率。与Bonferroni方法相比,Hochberg和Hommel方法提供了分析的电力增益,尽管是小的。 STIPDown-MINP程序对完整数据执行良好。但是,它在分析之前删除了缺失值的参与者,导致缺失数据时导致电力丢失。实现所需的除析出功率的样本尺寸要求可以小于实现所需边际功率所需的要求。无论是指定析出或边际功率是否应取决于幻影目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号