首页> 外文OA文献 >Do Psychosocial Interventions Improve Quality of Life and Wellbeing in Adults with Neuromuscular Disorders? A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis
【2h】

Do Psychosocial Interventions Improve Quality of Life and Wellbeing in Adults with Neuromuscular Disorders? A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

机译:心理社会干预措施是否有改善患有神经肌肉疾病的成年人的生活质量和福祉?系统审查和叙事综合

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Quality of life and well-being are frequently restricted in adults with neuromuscular disorders. As such, identification of appropriate interventions is imperative. Objective: The objective of this paper was to systematically review and critically appraise quantitative studies (RCTs, controlled trials and cohort studies) of psychosocial interventions designed to improve quality of life and well-being in adults with neuromuscular disorders. Method: A systematic review of the published and unpublished literature was conducted. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were appraised using a validated quality assessment tool and results presented in a narrative synthesis. Results: Out of 3,136 studies identified, ten studies met criteria for inclusion within the review. Included studies comprised a range of interventions including: cognitive behavioural therapy, dignity therapy, hypnosis, expressive disclosure, gratitude lists, group psychoeducation and psychologically informed rehabilitation. Five of the interventions were for patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). The remainder were for patients with post-polio syndrome, muscular dystrophies and mixed disorders, such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, myasthenia gravis and myotonic dystrophy. Across varied interventions and neuromuscular disorders, seven studies reported a short-term beneficial effect of intervention on quality of life and well-being. Whilst such findings are encouraging, widespread issues with the methodological quality of these studies significantly compromised the results. Conclusion: There is no strong evidence that psychosocial interventions improve quality of life and well-being in adults with neuromuscular disorders, due to a paucity of high quality research in this field. Multi-site, randomised controlled trials with active controls, standardised outcome measurement and longer term follow-ups are urgently required.
机译:背景:患有神经肌肉疾病的成年人经常会受到生活质量和幸福感的限制。因此,确定适当的干预措施势在必行。目的:本文的目的是系统地审查和批判性地评估旨在改善神经肌肉疾病患者的生活质量和幸福感的社会心理干预措施的定量研究(RCT,对照试验和队列研究)。方法:对已发表和未发表的文献进行系统评价。使用经过验证的质量评估工具对符合纳入标准的研究进行评估,并在叙述性综合报告中提供结果。结果:在确定的3,136项研究中,有10项研究符合纳入评价的标准。包括的研究包括一系列干预措施,包括:认知行为疗法,尊严疗法,催眠,表达性披露,感谢清单,团体心理教育和心理康复。其中五项干预措施适用于肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)患者。其余的患者是患有脊髓灰质炎后综合症,肌肉营养不良和混合性疾病(如夏科特-玛丽-牙齿疾病,重症肌无力和肌强直性营养不良)的患者。在各种干预措施和神经肌肉疾病中,有七项研究报告了干预措施对生活质量和幸福感的短期有益影响。尽管这些发现令人鼓舞,但这些研究的方法学质量普遍存在的问题严重影响了结果。结论:由于该领域缺乏高质量的研究,因此没有强有力的证据表明社会心理干预措施可以改善神经肌肉疾病患者的生活质量和幸福感。迫切需要具有主动控制,标准化结果测量和长期随访的多站点随机对照试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号