首页> 外文OA文献 >Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Dan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Pada Materi Garis Singgung Lingkaran
【2h】

Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Dan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Pada Materi Garis Singgung Lingkaran

机译:合作学习模型类型思想对分享(TPS)和合作学习模型学生团队成就司(Stad)类型数学学习成果的切线材料

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This research is to prove whether the learning result of Student Mathematics with cooperative learning model of TPS type is better than the result of student learning of Mathematics with STAD type cooperative learning model on tangent material of circle. The population is the students of State Junior High School 1 East Cikarang. The sample was taken by using cluster random sampling technique from the population by randomized method, ie students of class VIII F and class VIII G as many as 60 students. The analysis test is done by normality test and homogeneity test. Normality test using Lilliefors test and Homogeneity test using Fisher test. While the hypothesis test using t-test. Based on the calculation obtained data that Lilliefors model of cooperative learning model type TPS Lhitung = 0.0954 and for Ltabel = 0.161 (0.0954 < 0.161) and for cooperative learning model type STAD = 0.1266 and for Ltabel = 0.161 (0, 1266 < 0.161), so it can be concluded that the cooperative learning model of TPS type and STAD type cooperative learning model come from the normally distributed population. Homogeneity test using Fisher test obtained Fhitung = 1.15 and Ftabel = 1.86 (1.15 ttable then H0 is rejected. The conclusion of this research is there are difference of mathematics learning result of students using cooperative learning model of TPS type and mathematics learning result of students using STAD type cooperative learning model in tangent circle material in class VIII SMPN 1 Cikarang East Bekasi.
机译:这项研究是为了证明学生数学与TPS类型的合作学习模式学习的结果是否优于数学的学生的学习与STAD的结果对圆的切线材料类型的合作学习模式。人口是州初中1西卡朗东的学生。将样品取出,通过使用群随机抽样技术从群体中随机通过方法中,类VIII F和类VIIIģ即学生多达60名。分析测试由正态性检验和同质性检验。正态性检验采用采用Fisher检验里尔福斯测试和同质测试。虽然采用t检验的假设检验。基于计算得到的数据合作学习模型类型TPS Lhitung = 0.0954 Ltabel = 0.161和用于Ltabel = 0.161(0.0954 <0.161)和合作学习模型类型STAD = 0.1266和里尔福斯模型(0,1266 <0.161),因此可以得出结论,TPS类型和STAD的合作学习模型类型的合作学习模式来自于正态分布的人口。获得使用Fisher检验均一性检验Fhitung = 1.15和Ftabel = 1.86(1.15 TTable的则H0被拒绝。这项研究的结论是,有数学学习使用TPS类型的合作学习模式的学生成绩和数学利用学生的学习结果的差异在切圆材料STAD型合作学习模式在八年级SMPN 1西卡朗东勿加泗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号