首页> 外文OA文献 >The Cost of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management Matches with Clinical Course: A Single Outpatient Centre Analysis
【2h】

The Cost of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management Matches with Clinical Course: A Single Outpatient Centre Analysis

机译:炎症性肠病管理与临床疗法的成本:单一门诊中心分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have a large economic burden on health systems. Our single-centre observational retrospective study aimed to assess an economic evaluation in two IBD outpatient cohorts (biological and conventional therapy) in relation to disease activity within a three-year follow-up. Four hundred and seventeen consecutive IBD patients referred to our tertiary gastroenterology unit (Bari-Puglia-Southern Italy) on January 2014–December 2016 were included. For each group (conventional/biological), we assessed direct/indirect costs and clinical/endoscopic activity within the first year and along the three-year follow-up. Statistical analyses: Wilcoxon signed-rank test (continuous variables), chi-square and Fisher’s test (categorical variables), Spearman ranks (single outcome) and ANOVA (detection time, clinical/endoscopic scores) were used. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and range and/or median, interquartile range and range; categorical variables were expressed as proportions with 95% confidence interval. Direct and indirect cost items of 2014 and 2014–2016 were higher in patients treated with biological than conventional therapy. Subjects on biological therapy were younger and showed clinical and endoscopic moderate-to-severe disease activity. After three years, they reached a significant improvement from baseline. Conversely, disease activity was mild when conventional treatment had a beneficial effect. In conclusion, overall IBD management cost matches with clinical course and needs long-term evaluation in critical patients.
机译:炎症性肠病(IBD)对卫生系统具有很大的经济负担。我们的单中心观测回顾性研究旨在评估两次IBD门诊队列(生物和常规治疗)的经济评估,与疾病活动在三年后续随访中。纳入了四百七十六个连续的IBD患者,2016年1月至2016年1月提交了我们的第三次胃肠学单位(意大利Bari-Puglia-Southern南部)。对于每组(常规/生物学),我们在第一年内评估了第一年的直接/间接成本和临床/内窥镜活动,并沿着为期三年的随访。统计分析:Wilcoxon签名 - 等级测试(连续变量),Chi-Square和Fisher的测试(分类变量),使用Spearman等级(单一结果)和ANOVA(检测时间,临床/内窥镜评分)。连续变量表示为平均值±标准偏差和范围和/或中位数,间条范围和范围;分类变量表示为具有95%置信区间的比例。 2014年和2014-2016的直接和间接成本项目在生物学患者比常规治疗的患者中较高。生物疗法的受试者是年轻的,并且显示出临床和内窥镜中度至严重的疾病活动。三年后,他们从基线达到了重大改善。相反,当常规治疗具有有益效果时,疾病活性温和。总之,整体IBD管理成本与临床课程匹配,需要在关键患者中进行长期评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号