首页> 外文OA文献 >Living with an acquired brain injury. Barriers and facilitators to developing community supports as a basis for independent living: the experiences and perceptions of people with acquired brain injury
【2h】

Living with an acquired brain injury. Barriers and facilitators to developing community supports as a basis for independent living: the experiences and perceptions of people with acquired brain injury

机译:患有后天性脑损伤。发展社区支持的障碍和促进者作为独立生活的基础:后天性脑损伤患者的经验和看法

摘要

This study found that natural community supports were comprised of two distinct groupings; firstly immediate families, friends and peer support groups; secondly neighbours and local community groups such as sporting and activity- based organisations and groups. The findings of this study indicate that living with acquired brain injury involves a process where the person moves from acute high intensity health services onto rehabilitative services and then onto re-establishing independent lives. It is evident that smooth transitions and interconnectivity of services are essential in facilitating this recovery process. Instrumental to the recovery is the support of immediate family and close friends, who form people’s immediate natural support network and go a long way towards facilitating individuals in rebuilding their lives. A key finding of this study is that broader natural community supports do not appear to play as central a role in supporting individuals to live independent lives when compared to the role of family and friends. The lack of involvement of broader community groups, in many ways, prompted individuals to contact formal support services. For the majority of participants, independence is facilitated through the combination of immediate natural community supports and formal services. The role of formal support services is key to developing broader community support networks. This study found a blurred division between formal services and broader community support networks. The authors recommended that the role of formal supports services in acting as a bridge between the needs of the individual and the development of meaningful community networks, be formally recognised and further developed. Additionally, they argued that the importance of the role of broader natural community, supports such as those provided by community and sporting groups must be enhanced. Greater awareness of the issues faced by people living with acquired brain injury and its often invisible nature is necessary in this endeavour. The authors stated it is important to recognise that there are multiple issues impacting on independent living and these issues intersect, for instance with age, gender, employment, qualifications and so on. A lack of public awareness of acquired brain injury was found to be a key barrier to independent living, along with issues relating to socialising, access to employment and finances. The findings of this study reflect the complexities of living with acquired brain injury and the need for holistic support that is cognisant of the factors which impact on integration. It is vital that flexible, personalised services are developed which are fit for purpose and meet the needs of not only people with acquired brain injury but also their immediate natural community support network. Recognition of the intersection between immediate/ broader natural community supports and formal services is also key to developing the comprehensive and practical supports required to achieve an independent life. This was a qualitative study and all participants were sourced through Headway, a community based service provider for people with ABI. Data collection was divided into two stages: firstly focus groups, followed by individual interviews. Four focus groups were convened in Cork (2), Dublin (1) and Limerick (1). Each focus group was facilitated by at least two members of the research team and a total of twenty-six individuals participated in the focus groups. Thematic analysis of the data was undertaken to guide and inform the second stage of the study; the individual interviews. Ten interviews were undertaken with individuals who presented with ABI in the Cork and Limerick regions.
机译:这项研究发现,自然社区的支持包括两个不同的群体。首先是直系亲属,朋友和同伴支持团体;其次是邻居和当地社区团体,例如基于体育和活动的组织和团体。这项研究的结果表明,患有后天性脑损伤的人需要从急性高强度医疗服务转移到康复服务,然后再恢复独立生活的过程。显然,服务的平稳过渡和互连对于促进此恢复过程至关重要。直系亲属和亲密朋友的支持对康复起到了作用,亲密朋友和亲密朋友形成了人们的直接自然支持网络,并且在促进个人重建生活方面大有帮助。这项研究的关键发现是,与家人和朋友相比,更广泛的自然社区支持在支持个人过独立生活方面似乎没有发挥中心作用。广大社区团体缺乏参与的许多方面促使个人联系正式的支持服务。对于大多数参与者而言,直接的自然社区支持和正式服务的结合促进了独立性。正式支持服务的作用是建立更广泛的社区支持网络的关键。这项研究发现,正规服务与更广泛的社区支持网络之间的界限模糊。作者建议正式认可并进一步发展正式支持服务在个人需求与有意义的社区网络发展之间架起桥梁的作用。此外,他们认为,必须增强更广泛的自然社区的作用,社区和体育团体提供的支持等重要性。在这项工作中,必须加深对患有后天性脑损伤的人所面临的问题及其通常不可见的性质的认识。作者们指出,认识到影响独立生活的因素很多,而这些问题是相互交叉的,例如年龄,性别,就业,资格等,这一点很重要。人们发现缺乏对后天性脑损伤的公众意识以及与社交,就业和财务有关的问题是独立生活的关键障碍。这项研究的结果反映出患有后天性脑损伤的生活的复杂性以及对整体性影响因素认识的整体支持的需求。开发灵活,个性化的服务非常重要,这些服务既适合于目标,又能满足患有脑损伤的人们以及他们直接的自然社区支持网络的需求。认识到直接/广泛的自然社区支持与正式服务之间的交集,对于开发实现独立生活所需的全面和实际支持也是至关重要的。这是一项定性研究,所有参与者均来自Headway,后者是一家为ABI患者提供社区服务的提供商。数据收集分为两个阶段:首先是焦点小组,然后是个人访谈。在科克(2),都柏林(1)和利默里克(1)召集了四个焦点小组。每个焦点小组由研究团队的至少两名成员协助,共有26位个人参加了焦点小组。对数据进行了专题分析,以指导和告知研究的第二阶段;个人访谈。对在科克和利默里克地区与ABI进行交流的个人进行了十次采访。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号