首页> 外文OA文献 >A hydrogeological study of the interaction between Avon River baseflow and shallow groundwater, Christchurch, New Zealand
【2h】

A hydrogeological study of the interaction between Avon River baseflow and shallow groundwater, Christchurch, New Zealand

机译:新西兰基督城雅芳河底流与浅层地下水相互作用的水文地质研究

摘要

The relationship between shallow groundwater levels and Avon River baseflow upstream of Gloucester Street has been investigated. Avon River baseflow is supplied by shallow groundwater-fed springs. Historical and anecdotal information indicate that since European settlement of the Christchurch area in the 1850's, Avon River baseflow has declined. The baseflow decline is attributed to the progressive lowering of the Christchurch area watertable which has caused downstream migration of headwater spring positions and a reduction in spring discharge. Prior to this study minimal historical Avon River flow data existed, and a quantitative estimation of the decline in baseflow is not possible. A management plan for maintaining acceptable baseflow levels in the Avon River is currently being developed by the Canterbury Regional Council. The aim of this study was to provide information on the relationship between Avon River baseflow and shallow groundwater levels to aid baseflow management. The Christchurch groundwater system is characterised by a watertable aquifer that overlies a series of layered confined aquifers. Direct groundwater discharge into the Avon River is considered to be from both the watertable aquifer and upper most confined aquifer. Groundwater was found to enter the river system by two different mechanisms; seepage through stream bed gravel and artesian spring discharge. Groundwater seepage through streambed gravel occurs where the stream channel intersects the watertable aquifer. Artesian springs occur where water-bearing gravels are overlain by between approximately 1 to 10 m of finer-grained confining sediment. Artesian spring water is thought to flow from both the watertable aquifer and the uppermost confined aquifer. Pipes through the confining sediment connect the spring vent to the underlying water-bearing gravels. When the hydraulic head of the underlying gravel aquifer is above the stream stage artesian spring flow will occur. Tributary baseflow and shallow groundwater data were collected for the 11 month period, February 1992 to January 1993. In addition, baseflow was separated from the Avon River flow record. Available flow data indicate that mean A von River baseflow at Gloucester Street from 1980 to 1992 was approximately 1700 1/s. In March 1993 Avon River baseflow was 50% of that in March 1980. Large rainfall events in late-August 1992 caused Avon River baseflow in January 1993 to increase to approximately 77% of the March 1980 value. Regression analysis established a relationship between both hydraulic head in the upper most confined aquifer and unconfined watertable levels, to Avon River baseflow (R² > 0.8). The flow hydrograph showed that the daily abstraction of shallow groundwater from beneath the catchment caused an associated reduction in flow. Seasonal fluctuations in spring discharge and baseflow were found to be greater in the western tributaries than the eastern tributaries. This is attributed to the greater seasonal fluctuation of shallow groundwater levels in the western area of the catchment than in the eastern area. From available data the peak in seasonal groundwater levels occurred throughout the study area during the period of 24-27 October 1992. No observable time delay occurred between the seasonal peaks in shallow groundwater levels and Avon River baseflow at Gloucester Street. In order to sustain acceptable rates of Avon River baseflow, shallow groundwater levels need to be maintained in areas of the catchment were groundwater enters the river. As a first step, the Canterbury Regional Council has placed restrictions on the abstraction of groundwater in areas where springs occur. The information presented in this study on the relationship between shallow groundwater levels and Avon River baseflow confirms the need for management of shallow groundwater levels in areas where groundwater contributes to baseflow. To ascertain the effectiveness of remedial measures continued monitoring of A von River baseflow and shallow groundwater levels are necessary.
机译:已经研究了格洛斯特街上游浅层地下水位与雅芳河底流之间的关系。雅芳河的底流由浅层地下水供给的泉水供应。历史和轶事资料表明,自从1850年代欧洲在克赖斯特彻奇地区定居以来,雅芳河的底流量就减少了。基流下降归因于克赖斯特彻奇地区地下水位的逐步降低,这导致了上游水源泉水位置的下游迁移和泉水流量的减少。在此研究之前,仅存在极少的历史性雅芳河流量数据,并且不可能对基流量的下降进行定量估计。坎特伯雷地区委员会目前正在制定一项管理计划,以维持雅芳河可接受的基础流量水平。本研究的目的是提供有关雅芳河底流与浅层地下水位之间关系的信息,以帮助进行底流管理。克赖斯特彻奇地下水系统的特点是在一系列分层承压含水层上覆盖着地下水位。地下水直接排放到雅芳河的原因是地下水位和最密闭含水层。发现地下水是通过两种不同的机制进入河流系统的。通过河床砾石渗流和自流泉水。通过河床砾石的地下水渗流发生在河道与地下水位相交的地方。自流泉发生在含水砾石覆盖约1至10 m的较细的限制沉积物的地方。自流泉水被认为是从地下水层和最上方的承压含水层中流出的。穿过限制沉积物的管道将弹簧出口连接到下面的含水砾石。当下面的砾石含水层的水力头在水流阶段时,将发生自流弹簧流。收集了1992年2月至1993年1月这11个月期间的支流基流和浅层地下水数据。此外,基流与雅芳河流量记录分开了。现有的流量数据表明,1980年至1992年格洛斯特街的平均A von River基流约为1700 1 / s。 1993年3月,雅芳河底流量是1980年3月的50%。1992年8月下旬的大降雨事件使1993年1月雅芳河底流量增加到1980年3月值的约77%。回归分析确定了最高承压含水层的水压头与无承压水位之间的关系,与雅芳河底流量之间的关系(R²> 0.8)。水文流量图显示,流域下方每天抽取浅层地下水会导致流量相应减少。发现西部支流的春季流量和基流的季节性波动大于东部支流。这是由于流域西部地区的浅层地下水水位季节波动大于东部地区。根据现有数据,季节性地下水位的峰值出现在整个研究区域,发生于1992年10月24日至27日。在浅层地下水位的季节性峰值与格洛斯特街的雅芳河底流之间没有可观察到的时间延迟。为了维持可接受的雅芳河底流速率,在地下水进入河流的集水区必须保持浅层地下水位。第一步,坎特伯雷区域委员会对发生温泉的地区的地下水进行了限制。这项研究中提供的有关浅层地下水水位与雅芳河底流之间关系的信息证实了在地下水有助于基流的地区管理浅层地下水水位的必要性。为了确定补救措施的有效性,有必要对A von河的基流和浅层地下水位进行持续监测。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cameron Stewart Graham;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1992
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号