首页> 外文OA文献 >Let`s Twist again : an empirical study of Operation Twist - and the Maturity Extension programs effect on the 10-year Treasury yield in 1961 and 2011-2012
【2h】

Let`s Twist again : an empirical study of Operation Twist - and the Maturity Extension programs effect on the 10-year Treasury yield in 1961 and 2011-2012

机译:让我们再次扭曲:扭曲操作的实证研究-到期扩展程序对1961年和2011-2012年10年期国债收益率的影响

摘要

This report investigates whether Operation Twist (1961) and the Maturity Extension Program (MEP) (2011-2012), has induced a decline in the 10-year Treasury yield. I discuss the economic starting points for the two monetary policies and if the broader objective of economic stimuli is achieved in the American economy today. By estimating-and predicting the 10-year yield I assess whether fundamental conditions in the American economy warrant the level of the10-year yield today-and in 1961. I further review whether the current low level can be explained by other monetary policies-or macroeconomic conditions.My results indicate that MEP might have given a downward pressure on the 10-year Treasury yield. By predicting the 10-year Treasury yield with the variables PMI, inflation, the trade balance, the effective federal funds rate, federal debt held by foreign-and international investors and the St. Louis Financial stress index there still remains, on average, a 55 basis point unexplained spread between the model-predicted yield and actual yield. My results especially indicate that foreign inflow of capital to Treasuries has been an important determinant for the development in the 10-year yield in the last years.I further find a small-and short lived effect of Operation Twist on the 10-year Treasury yield. My conclusions are mainly based on a marginal decline in the actual 10-year yield in 1961, but also because the amount of U.S marketable federal debt held by the public remains roughly unchanged in 1961.Overall I conclude that MEP might have been stimulating for the economy; longer-term yields have declined and there are signs of eased credit conditions. However, Quantitative easing programs in 2008-2010 and continuous forward guidance by the Federal Reserve are factors that most likely have contributed to the current low levels of the longer-term Treasury yields.
机译:本报告调查Twist Operation(1961)和Maturity Extension Program(MEP)(2011-2012)是否导致10年期美国国债收益率下降。我讨论了两种货币政策的经济起点,以及今天美国经济是否实现了更广泛的经济刺激目标。通过估算(并预测10年期国债收益率),我评估了美国经济的基本条件是否可以保证今天和1961年10年期国债收益率的水平。我进一步回顾了当前的低水平是否可以由其他货币政策来解释-或我的结果表明,环境保护部可能给10年期美国国债收益率带来下行压力。通过使用变量PMI,通货膨胀,贸易平衡,有效联邦基金利率,外国和国际投资者持有的联邦债务以及圣路易斯金融压力指数来预测十年期国债收益率,平均而言,仍然存在模型预测的收益率和实际收益率之间存在55个基点的无法解释的价差。我的结果特别表明,过去几年来,外国资本流入国债一直是10年期国债收益率发展的重要决定因素。我还发现Twist操作对10年期国债收益率的影响短暂且短暂。 。我的结论主要基于1961年实际10年期国债收益率的小幅下降,但也因为1961年公众持有的美国有价联邦债务的数量大致保持不变。经济;长期收益率已经下降,并且有放宽信贷状况的迹象。但是,2008-2010年的量化宽松计划以及美联储的持续前瞻性指导,很可能是导致目前长期国债收益率较低的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号