首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Assessing Site Readiness: Considerations about Transitioning to a Privatized Child Welfare System. Topical Paper Number 1
【24h】

Assessing Site Readiness: Considerations about Transitioning to a Privatized Child Welfare System. Topical Paper Number 1

机译:评估现场准备情况:关于过渡到私有化儿童福利系统的考虑因素。专题论文第1号

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of this first paper is to help child welfare administrators think through key issues about transitioning to a privatized system of service delivery. The paper is organized around 12 overarching questions that administrators need to ask themselves when assessing the readiness of their site. Some questions encourage sites to explore specifically why they are privatizing services and whether or not privatization is the best approach to meeting agency goals. The remaining five papers in this series will examine other specific areas. These are: .. Models of Privatization Reform .. Evolving Roles of Public and Private Agencies .. Developing Effective Contracts .. Contract Monitoring and Accountability .. Evaluating Privatization Initiatives This paper series builds on research, described below, conducted under the Quality Improvement Center on the Privatization of Child Welfare Services (QIC PCW), funded in 2005 by the Childrens Bureau, US Department of Health and Human Services. It also draws from the research on privatization in other, closely related social services. Information used for this paper series comes from several sources, including: Telephone discussions with state child welfare administrators from 44 states and the District of Columbia; Regional forums with public and private agency staff and community stakeholders from twelve states that have privatized at least one component of the child welfare system; Literature reviews; and Follow-up interviews and correspondence with public and private agency providers and key stakeholders from several states. From this work we have learned that many states and communities have strong privatization initiatives that continue to move forward. However, some communities have tested privatization and have pulled back from these efforts, largely due to poor performance on expected outcomes. Several existing initiatives have been significantly retooled based on lessons learned and unanticipated consequences of the privatized system.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号