Coordination: WIN and CETA. A Guide to Increasing the Enrollment of AFDC Recipients in CETA Programs

摘要

This technical assistance guide is based on three assumptions: (1) the impact of coordinated activities on the client is greatest at the local level, since that is where jobs exist, placements are developed, and services are provided; (2) although Work Incentive Program (WIN) and Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA) programs in all communities share common barriers, incentives, and points of opportunity for coordination, the unique character of program and political realities will vary from community to community; and (3) attitude, more than specific technique, is the real key to successful coordination. The guide is designed to provide personnel at the community service level working in both CETA and WIN programs with common perspectives on their programs and on the nature of service coordination; a comprehensive overview of the common features and differences in both programs, of obstacles to coordination and incentives to coordination; and some suggestions for designing methods at the local level to overcome the barriers, develop more effective linkages, and increase the number of Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC) hired in CETA positions, particularly in Public Service Employment (PSE). The guide presents an overview of the worlds of the client, the CETA prime sponsor, and WIN; an outline of the shared historical roots of WIN and CETA; and a discussion of the meaning and methods of coordination in the human services. WIN and CETA are described in terms of their legislative backgrounds, purposes, client groups, administrative systems, and achievements. Key differences between the programs are outlined, and their similarities are discussed. Problems and barriers to the placement of AFDC clients are described, and common barriers to coordination of WIN and CETA are listed, as are incentives for program coordination. In addition, the guide suggests alternatives and options for local prime sponsors. Figures are included. The appendix contains case studies of existing WIN and CETA relationships in six southern communities, a glossary, and 44 references. (Author abstract modified).