【24h】

Was Darwin a creationist?

机译:达尔文是神创论者吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Throughout the Origin of Species, Darwin contrasts his theory of natural selection with the theory that God independently created each species. This makes it seem as though the Origin offers a scientific alternative to a theological worldview. A few months after the Origin appeared, however, the eminent anatomist Richard Owen published a review that pointed out the theological assumptions of Darwin's theory. Owen worked in the tradition of rational morphology, within which one might suggest that evolution occurs by processes that are continuous with those by which life arises from matter; in contrast, Darwin rested his account of life's origins on the notion that God created one or a few life forms upon which natural selection could act. Owen argued that Darwin's reliance on God to explain the origins of life makes his version of evolution no less supernatural than the special creationist that Darwin criticizes: although Darwin limits God to one or a few acts of creation, he still relies upon God to explain life's existence.
机译:在整个物种起源中,达尔文将他的自然选择理论与上帝独立创造每个物种的理论进行了对比。这似乎使起源似乎提供了神学世界观的科学替代。然而,在《起源》出现几个月后,著名的解剖学家理查德·欧文(Richard Owen)发表了一篇评论,指出了达尔文理论的神学假设。欧文遵循理性形态学的传统,其中有人可能暗示进化是通过与生命由物质产生的过程连续的过程发生的。相反,达尔文对生命起源的解释是基于这样的观念,即上帝创造了一种或几种生命形式,自然选择可以在其中起作用。欧文辩称,达尔文依靠上帝来解释生命的起源,使得他的进化论版本不亚于达尔文批评的特殊神创论者超自然的:尽管达尔文将上帝限于一种或几种创造行为,但他仍然依靠上帝来解释生命的存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号