...
首页> 外文期刊>Steel in Translation >ARC EFFICIENCY IN THREE-PHASE AND DC STEEL-SMELTING ARC FURNACES
【24h】

ARC EFFICIENCY IN THREE-PHASE AND DC STEEL-SMELTING ARC FURNACES

机译:三相和直流钢熔炉的电弧效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The arc efficiency of small and moderate (3-25 tons) three-phase SAF is greater than that of dc furnaces of analogous capacity; consequently, the power consumption is 10-12 percent less in TPSAF than in DCSAF. The electrode consumption in small and moderate three-phase furnaces is larger by a factor of 1.5-2 than for dc furnaces of analogous capacity; this has the determining influence on the cost of 1 ton of steel, which is less for dc furnaces. On account of electromagnetic blowing of the arc, the arc efficiency of large (80-150 ton) three-phase SAF is less than that of dc furnaces of analogous capacity; typically, the power consumption in three-phase furnaces of larger capacity is 5-7 percent greater than that in large-capacity dc furnaces. The electrode consumption in large-capacity three-phase furnaces is 7-12 percent greater than for dc furnaces of analogous capacity; however, conclusions regarding the operational advantages of dc furnaces over three-phase furnaces would be premature, on account of the deficiencies of dc furnaces: the presence of a floor electrode of limited working life; operation with a liquid start; and the use of large electrodes. Currently, when the cost of 1 kg of electrodes is equal to the cost of 100-150 kW-hr/ton of power, the electrical operating conditions and structure of three-phase and dc steel-smelting arc furnaces are selected so as to reduce the electrode consumption, with possible increase in power consumption. The arc efficiency of large-capacity furnaces reached a maximum at the end of the 1970s (0.86-0.90), and is currently declining; it is 0.69-0.75 for current high-power furnaces. The power consumption of SAF may be reduced by using oxygen, fuel -oxygen burners, manipulators for foaming slag, coal, or coke, liquid iron, batch heating, waste-gas combustion, and bath mixing. Analysis of the structure and thermal operation of dc and three-phase SAF reveals that the scope for reducing electrode and power consumption in the furnaces has not been exhausted; new furnace designs could reduce power consumption by 5-10 percent and electrode consumption by 6-15 percent.
机译:中小型(3-25吨)三相SAF的电弧效率要高于类似容量的直流炉的电弧效率。因此,TPSAF的功耗要比DCSAF降低10-12%。中小型三相炉的电极消耗比类似容量的直流炉大1.5-2倍。这对1吨钢的成本具有决定性的影响,而这对于直流电炉来说要小得多。由于电弧的电磁吹塑,大型(80-150吨)三相SAF的电弧效率低于类似容量的直流炉的电弧效率。通常,大容量三相炉的功率消耗比大容量直流炉的功率消耗大5-7%。大容量三相炉的电极消耗比类似容量的直流炉大7-12%。然而,由于直流电炉的不足,得出关于直流电炉相对于三相电炉的运行优势的结论还为时过早。液体启动操作;以及使用大电极。当前,当1公斤电极的成本等于100-150千瓦时/吨电力的成本时,选择三相和dc钢熔炼电弧炉的电气工作条件和结构,以减少电极消耗,可能会增加功耗。大容量熔炉的电弧效率在1970年代末达到最高(0.86-0.90),并且目前正在下降。对于当前的大功率熔炉,该值为0.69-0.75。通过使用氧气,燃料氧气燃烧器,用于将矿渣,煤或焦炭发泡的操纵器,液态铁,间歇加热,废气燃烧和浴液混合,可以降低SAF的功耗。对直流和三相SAF的结构和热运行的分析表明,减少炉子中电极和功率消耗的范围尚未耗尽。新的熔炉设计可将功耗降低5-10%,电极消耗降低6-15%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号