首页> 外文期刊>Southern Medical Journal >Treatment of osteoarthritis.
【24h】

Treatment of osteoarthritis.

机译:治疗骨关节炎。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Although cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (coxibs) were developed to cause less gastrointestinal hemorrhage than nonselective nonsterodial antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), there has been concern about their cardiovascular safety. The relative risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was studied among users of celecoxib, rofecoxib, and NSAIDs in Medicare beneficiaries with a comprehensive drug benefit. METHODS: A matched case-control study was conducted of 54,475 patients 65 years of age or older who received their medications through two state-sponsored pharmaceutical benefits programs in the United States. All healthcare use encounters were examined to identify hospitalizations for AMI. Each of the 10,895 cases of AMI were matched to four controls on the basis of age, gender, and the month of index date. A matched logistic regression model was constructed, including indicators for patient demographics, healthcare use, medication use, and cardiovascular risk factors to assess the relative risk of AMI in patients who used rofecoxib compared with persons taking no NSAID, taking celecoxib, or taking NSAIDs. RESULTS: Current use of rofecoxib was associated with an elevated relative risk of AMI compared with celecoxib (OR 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.46; P = 0.011), and with no NSAID (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31; P = 0.054). The adjusted relative risk of AMI was also elevated in dose-specific comparasions; rofecoxib < or = 25 mg versus celecoxib < or = 200 mg (OR 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.44; P = 0.036) and rofecoxib > 25 mg versus celecoxib > 200 mg (OR 1.70; 95% CI, 1.07-2.71; P = 0.026). The adjusted relative risks of AMI associated with rofecoxib use of 1 to 30 days (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.12-1.75; P = 0.005) and 31 to 90 days (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.11-1.72; P = 0.003) were higher than > 90 days (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.72-1.25; P = 0.8) compared with celecoxib use of similar duration. Celecoxib was not associated with an increased relative risk of AMI in these comparisions. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, current rofecoxib use was associated with an elevated relative risk of AMI compared with celecoxib use and no NSAID use. Dosages of rofecoxib greater than 25 mg were associated with a higher risk than dosages of 25 mg or less. The risk was elevated in the first 90 days of use, but not thereafter.
机译:目的:尽管开发了环氧合酶2抑制剂(coxibs)引起的胃肠道出血比非选择性非立体式抗炎药(NSAIDs)少,但人们对其心血管安全性表示关注。在具有综合药物获益的Medicare受益人中,对使用celecoxib,rofecoxib和NSAID的使用者进行了急性心肌梗塞(AMI)的相对风险研究。方法:在美国进行了一项配对病例对照研究,研究对象是54,475名65岁或65岁以上的患者,他们通过两个由国家资助的药物福利计划来接受药物治疗。检查了所有医疗保健使用情况,以确定AMI的住院治疗。根据年龄,性别和索引日期的月份,将10,895例AMI病例中的每一个都与四个对照组相匹配。构建匹配的Logistic回归模型,包括患者人口统计学,医疗保健使用,药物使用和心血管危险因素的指标,以评估与未服用NSAID,服用塞来昔布或服用NSAID的人相比,使用rofecoxib的患者发生AMI的相对风险。结果:与塞来昔布相比,目前使用罗非昔布与AMI的相对危险性升高相关(OR 1.14; 95%CI,1.05-1.46; P = 0.011),无NSAID(OR,1.14; 95%CI,1.00- 1.31; P = 0.054)。调整后的AMI相对危险度在剂量特异性比较中也有所增加。 rofecoxib <或= 25 mg与celecoxib <或= 200 mg(OR 1.21; 95%CI,1.01-1.44; P = 0.036),rofecoxib> 25 mg vs celecoxib> 200 mg(OR 1.70; 95%CI,1.07-2.71 ; P = 0.026)。调整后的与罗非昔布使用相关的AMI相对风险为1至30天(OR,1.40; 95%CI,1.12-1.75; P = 0.005)和31至90天(OR,1.38; 95%CI,1.11-1.72;与塞来昔布相似的使用期限相比,P = 0.003)高于> 90天(OR,0.96; 95%CI,0.72-1.25; P = 0.8)。在这些比较中,塞来昔布与AMI相对危险度增加无关。结论:在这项研究中,与使用塞洛昔布和不使用NSAID相比,当前使用罗非昔布与AMI的相对风险升高有关。罗非昔布大于25 mg的剂量比25 mg或更少的剂量具有更高的风险。使用前90天的风险有所增加,但此后没有增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号