首页> 外文期刊>Spinal cord: the official journal of the International Medical Society of Paraplegia >Is the outcome in acute spinal cord ischaemia different from that in traumatic spinal cord injury? A cross-sectional analysis of the neurological and functional outcome in a cohort of 93 paraplegics.
【24h】

Is the outcome in acute spinal cord ischaemia different from that in traumatic spinal cord injury? A cross-sectional analysis of the neurological and functional outcome in a cohort of 93 paraplegics.

机译:急性脊髓缺血的结果与创伤性脊髓损伤的结果不同吗?一组93名截瘫患者的神经和功能结局的横断面分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To compare the neurological outcome between paraplegic patients with acute spinal cord ischaemia syndrome (ASCIS) or traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) and to investigate the influence of SCI aetiology on the total Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)-II score. SETTING: Level 1 trauma centre. METHODS: Initial (0-40 days) and chronic-phase (6-12 months) American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) sensory scores, lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and chronic-phase total SCIM-II scores were analysed. Differences between ASCIS and tSCI patients were calculated using Student's t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. To assess which variables give rise to the prediction of total SCIM-II score, a multiple linear regression analysis was used. These predictor variables included complete (ASIA impairment scale A) or incomplete SCI (AIS B, C, and D), aetiology, age and gender. RESULTS: Out of 93 included patients, 20 ASCIS and 73 tSCI patients were identified. In the complete SCI group, the initial pinprick scores were higher (P<0.05) in ASCIS patients compared with tSCI patients, 37.9 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 23.3-52.5) and 27.3 (95% CI, 24.1-30.4), respectively. No other relevant differences in neurological outcome were identified between ASCIS and tSCI patients; however, the total SCIM-II scores were higher (P<0.05) in tSCI patients after 12 months. Using the linear regression analysis, we were able to predict 31.4% of the variability. The aetiology was not significant in this model. CONCLUSION: The neurological outcome was independent of the diagnosis ASCIS or tSCI. Furthermore, the diagnosis ASCIS or tSCI was not a significant predictor for total SCIM II scores after 12 months. SPONSORSHIP: This study was granted by the 'Internationale Stiftung fur Forschung in Paraplegie' (IFP), Zurich, Switzerland.
机译:研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:比较截瘫患者急性脊髓缺血综合征(ASCIS)或外伤性脊髓损伤(tSCI)的神经系统结果,并调查SCI病因对总脊髓独立性指标(SCIM)-II评分的影响。地点:1级创伤中心。方法:分析美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)的初始(0-40天)和慢性期(6-12个月)的感觉评分,下肢运动评分(LEMS)和慢性期SCIM-II总评分。使用学生t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验计算ASCIS和tSCI患者之间的差异。为了评估哪些变量引起对SCIM-II总得分的预测,使用了多元线性回归分析。这些预测变量包括完全(ASIA损伤量表A)或不完全SCI(AIS B,C和D),病因,年龄和性别。结果:在93名患者中,鉴定出20名ASCIS和73名tSCI患者。在完整SCI组中,与tSCI患者相比,ASCIS患者的初始针刺得分更高(P <0.05),分别为37.9(95%置信区间(CI),23.3-52.5)和27.3(95%CI,24.1-30.4) , 分别。在ASCIS和tSCI患者之间未发现神经系统结局的其他相关差异。然而,tSCI患者在12个月后的总SCIM-II评分较高(P <0.05)。使用线性回归分析,我们能够预测31.4%的变异性。在该模型中病因并不明显。结论:神经学预后独立于ASCIS或tSCI的诊断。此外,在12个月后,诊断ASCIS或tSCI并不是SCIM II总得分的重要预测指标。赞助:这项研究是由瑞士苏黎世的“国际截肢皮草基金会”(IFP)批准的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号