首页> 外文期刊>Soil Biology & Biochemistry >Plant-soil biota interactions of an invasive species in. its native and introduced ranges: Implications for invasion success
【24h】

Plant-soil biota interactions of an invasive species in. its native and introduced ranges: Implications for invasion success

机译:入侵物种在其原生和引入范围内的植物-土壤生物区相互作用:对入侵成功的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Biotic interactions of exotic plant species in their introduced ranges may differ from those of co-occurring plant species and from interactions in their native range. Interactions less negative (Enemy Release Hypothesis) or more positive (Enhanced Mutualist Hypothesis) compared to native plants may enhance invasive success and change exotic plant traits. We investigated plant soil interactions of Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera) from China (native range) and US (invasive range) populations along with US and China species within four co-occurring genera (Liquidambar, Litmus, Celtis, and Platanus) grown in both ranges. Treatments included sterilized, home, away, active mix, and fungicide treated soils. The net effect of soil biota on Triadica performance was generally negative or had no effect in its native range but was always positive in its invasive range. In China, Triadica had higher survival and biomass in "away" (heterospecific) soils than in "home" (conspecific) soil, but in the US, only biomass was higher. The pattern of performance in home and away soils suggests a stronger negative effect of specific pathogens for Triadica in China (Enemy Release Hypothesis). No other species had a significant feedback in either range. Triadica mycorrhizal colonization was higher in the US than in China supporting the Enhanced Mutualist Hypothesis. On average, Triadica performance was similar for native and invasive populations. However, invasive populations had greater biomass in active mix than in sterilized or fungicide-treated soil and native populations had higher mycorrhizal colonization in home than in away soils or active mix. These population origin results suggest genetic differences in strength or specificity of mycorrhizal interactions. Overall, our results support both ecological and evolutionary variation in interactions with the soil community that may influence the invasion success of exotic plants.
机译:外来植物物种在其引入范围内的生物相互作用可能与共生植物物种的生物相互作用以及在其天然范围内的相互作用不同。与天然植物相比,交互作用较小的负面反应(“敌人释放假说”)或较阳性的交互作用(增强的互惠假说)可能会增强入侵成功并改变外来植物性状。我们调查了两个地区同时存在的中国牛脂(Triadica sebifera)和美国(入侵范围)种群以及美国和中国物种在四个共同存在的属(Liquidambar,Litmus,Celtis和Platanus)中植物土壤的相互作用。范围。处理包括无菌,家庭,外出,活性混合物和杀菌剂处理过的土壤。土壤生物区系对Triadica性能的净影响通常在其自然范围内为阴性或无影响,但在其侵入范围内始终为正面。在中国,Triadica在“异地”(异种)土壤中的存活率和生物量高于“本垒打”(同种)土壤,但是在美国,仅生物量更高。在家庭和外地土壤中的表现模式表明,中国的Triadica特定病原体具有更强的负面影响(敌人释放假说)。在这两个范围内,没有其他物种有明显的反馈。在美国,Triadica菌根菌落定植率高于在中国,这支持了加强互惠假说。平均而言,Triadica对本地和入侵人群的表现相似。但是,侵入性种群在活性混合物中的生物量要大于经过灭菌或杀真菌剂处理的土壤,而原生种群在家庭中的菌根定植要高于无土或活性混合物。这些人群起源的结果表明,菌根相互作用的强度或特异性存在遗传差异。总体而言,我们的结果支持与土壤群落相互作用的生态和进化变异,这可能会影响外来植物的入侵成功。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号