...
首页> 外文期刊>Obesity surgery >Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Prospective randomized clinical study comparing two different techniques. Preliminary results
【24h】

Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Prospective randomized clinical study comparing two different techniques. Preliminary results

机译:腹腔镜袖胃切除术中加固吻合线:比较两种不同技术的前瞻性随机临床研究。初步结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Sleeve gastrectomy involves the creation of small gastric reservoir based on lesser curvature of the stomach, which is fashioned by a longitudinal gastrectomy that preserves the antrum and pylorus together with its vagal innervation. The main complications in the early postoperative course are bleeding and gastric leak. In order to reduce these complications the staple line can be reinforced in many different ways. The purpose of this study was to randomly compare two different techniques in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG): buttressing the staple line at the gastroesophageal junction (angle of Hiss) with Gore Seamguard and staple-line suturing with PDS 2.0. Methods: Between July 2009 and July 2010, 90 patients were prospectively and randomly enrolled in the two different techniques of handling the staple line during LSG. Forty-eight of these patients belonged in group A (application of Gore Seamguard) and 42 in group B (application of a continuous suture). Operative and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: Postoperative leak affected two patients in group A (4.2%) and bleeding occurred in one patient of group A (2%). Total complication rate was 6.2% for group A. No major surgical complication occurred in group B. The differences between the two groups did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: No significant difference is evidenced in terms of bleeding and postoperative leak between the two techniques of enhancing the staple line in LSG. Suturing of the staple line may be more time consuming but costs are considerably less.
机译:背景:袖胃切除术包括根据较小的胃曲度创建小的胃贮器,这是通过纵向胃切除术形成的,该术式保留了窦腔和幽门及其迷走神经。术后初期的主要并发症是出血和胃漏。为了减少这些并发症,可以以许多不同的方式来加固钉书钉线。这项研究的目的是随机比较两种不同的腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LSG)技术:用Gore Seamguard支撑胃食管交界处的吻合线(嘶嘶角)和用PDS 2.0缝合吻合线。方法:在2009年7月至2010年7月之间,对90名患者进行了前瞻性随机研究,他们采用了两种在LSG手术中处理钉书钉的不同技术。这些患者中有48位属于A组(应用Gore Seamguard),而B组则有42位(应用连续缝合)。记录手术和术后并发症。结果:术后渗漏影响了A组的2例患者(4.2%),A组的1例患者(2%)发生了出血。 A组总并发症发生率为6.2%。B组未发生大手术并发症。两组之间的差异没有统计学意义。结论:两种在LSG钉书钉固定术上的出血和术后渗漏之间无明显差异。缝合吻合钉线可能比较耗时,但成本却要低得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号